Object

Representation ID: 29833

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Concerns regarding the provision of land for employment purposes within the allocation. The restriction of Uses identified at R03, 1(d) is not justified. The restriction to “light industrial, research and development (within Class E) or other sui generis employment uses which are compatible with the residential development”, could limit
opportunities for other employment-generating uses suitable for this location. Further, it would be illogical to suggest that sui generis employment generating uses are acceptable, but that employment-generating uses that fall into other categories are inherently unacceptable and should be restricted.

Object

Representation ID: 29865

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Concerned that the amendments to Policy R16; 1(a) do not fully reflect the concerns raised and discussed in some detail thorough the examination sessions in respect of the access to the Site. There is a need for greater flexibility on the access options for the site in order to ensure deliverability. Given the need for the policy to be effective and to contain a degree of flexibility (as there are no policy or technical reasons to require access solely from Doddinghurst Road), alternative wording is recommended.