Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Search representations
Results for Blackmore Village Heritage Association search
New search
New search
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
POLICY SP01: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Respondent: Blackmore Village Heritage Association
Legally compliant? Not specified
Representation Summary:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
The plan is unsound. The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
Change suggested by respondent:
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blackmore's inclusion in the LDP solely. Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is hereby re-submitted. Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Full text:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
Section 08
Policy NE06 8.5-8.64
Para 8.85 (iv)
Para 8.90
Para 8.101
Policy NE13
Section 09
Policy R25, 9.197-9.200
Policy R26, 9.201-204
The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
1. There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
2. BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
3. The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
4. There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
5. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
6. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
7. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
8. The access off/from Redrose Lane is entirely unsuitable for this volume of traffic movements.
9. The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
10. Both fields (R25 and R26) are teeming with wildlife - hundreds of birds nest in the hedgerows within and around the fields. We have photographic evidence (stills and videos) of certain protected species (bats, Barn Owls, Great Crested Newts).
Proposed modifications
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blckmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.
Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is herby re-submitted.
Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Why attend Examination in person?
As Chairman of he "Blackmore Village Heritage Association", I wish to present our own vision for our village based on what Blackmore actually needs.
There will be a form of "Neighbourhood Plan" available, which will significantly update the attached village survey dated 2018.
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
POLICY SP02: MANAGING GROWTH
Respondent: Blackmore Village Heritage Association
Legally compliant? Not specified
Representation Summary:
SP01 & Sp02
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
The plan is unsound. The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
Change suggested by respondent:
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blackmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is hereby re-submitted. Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Full text:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
Section 08
Policy NE06 8.5-8.64
Para 8.85 (iv)
Para 8.90
Para 8.101
Policy NE13
Section 09
Policy R25, 9.197-9.200
Policy R26, 9.201-204
The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
1. There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
2. BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
3. The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
4. There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
5. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
6. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
7. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
8. The access off/from Redrose Lane is entirely unsuitable for this volume of traffic movements.
9. The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
10. Both fields (R25 and R26) are teeming with wildlife - hundreds of birds nest in the hedgerows within and around the fields. We have photographic evidence (stills and videos) of certain protected species (bats, Barn Owls, Great Crested Newts).
Proposed modifications
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blckmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.
Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is herby re-submitted.
Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Why attend Examination in person?
As Chairman of he "Blackmore Village Heritage Association", I wish to present our own vision for our village based on what Blackmore actually needs.
There will be a form of "Neighbourhood Plan" available, which will significantly update the attached village survey dated 2018.
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Respondent: Blackmore Village Heritage Association
Legally compliant? Not specified
Representation Summary:
The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
Change suggested by respondent:
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blackmore's inclusion in the LDP solely. Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is hereby re-submitted. Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Full text:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
Section 08
Policy NE06 8.5-8.64
Para 8.85 (iv)
Para 8.90
Para 8.101
Policy NE13
Section 09
Policy R25, 9.197-9.200
Policy R26, 9.201-204
The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
1. There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
2. BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
3. The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
4. There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
5. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
6. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
7. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
8. The access off/from Redrose Lane is entirely unsuitable for this volume of traffic movements.
9. The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
10. Both fields (R25 and R26) are teeming with wildlife - hundreds of birds nest in the hedgerows within and around the fields. We have photographic evidence (stills and videos) of certain protected species (bats, Barn Owls, Great Crested Newts).
Proposed modifications
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blckmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.
Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is herby re-submitted.
Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Why attend Examination in person?
As Chairman of he "Blackmore Village Heritage Association", I wish to present our own vision for our village based on what Blackmore actually needs.
There will be a form of "Neighbourhood Plan" available, which will significantly update the attached village survey dated 2018.
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
POLICY NE13: SITE ALLOCATIONS IN THE GREEN BELT
Respondent: Blackmore Village Heritage Association
Representation Summary:
There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
Change suggested by respondent:
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blackmore's inclusion in the LDP solely. Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is hereby re-submitted. Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Full text:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
Section 08
Policy NE06 8.5-8.64
Para 8.85 (iv)
Para 8.90
Para 8.101
Policy NE13
Section 09
Policy R25, 9.197-9.200
Policy R26, 9.201-204
The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
1. There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
2. BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
3. The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
4. There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
5. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
6. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
7. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
8. The access off/from Redrose Lane is entirely unsuitable for this volume of traffic movements.
9. The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
10. Both fields (R25 and R26) are teeming with wildlife - hundreds of birds nest in the hedgerows within and around the fields. We have photographic evidence (stills and videos) of certain protected species (bats, Barn Owls, Great Crested Newts).
Proposed modifications
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blckmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.
Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is herby re-submitted.
Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Why attend Examination in person?
As Chairman of he "Blackmore Village Heritage Association", I wish to present our own vision for our village based on what Blackmore actually needs.
There will be a form of "Neighbourhood Plan" available, which will significantly update the attached village survey dated 2018.
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
POLICY R25: LAND NORTH OF WOOLLARD WAY
Respondent: Blackmore Village Heritage Association
Legally compliant? Not specified
Representation Summary:
There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
Change suggested by respondent:
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blackmore's inclusion in the LDP solely. Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is hereby re-submitted. Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Full text:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
Section 08
Policy NE06 8.5-8.64
Para 8.85 (iv)
Para 8.90
Para 8.101
Policy NE13
Section 09
Policy R25, 9.197-9.200
Policy R26, 9.201-204
The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
1. There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
2. BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
3. The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
4. There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
5. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
6. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
7. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
8. The access off/from Redrose Lane is entirely unsuitable for this volume of traffic movements.
9. The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
10. Both fields (R25 and R26) are teeming with wildlife - hundreds of birds nest in the hedgerows within and around the fields. We have photographic evidence (stills and videos) of certain protected species (bats, Barn Owls, Great Crested Newts).
Proposed modifications
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blckmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.
Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is herby re-submitted.
Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Why attend Examination in person?
As Chairman of he "Blackmore Village Heritage Association", I wish to present our own vision for our village based on what Blackmore actually needs.
There will be a form of "Neighbourhood Plan" available, which will significantly update the attached village survey dated 2018.
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
POLICY R26: LAND NORTH OF ORCHARD PIECE
Respondent: Blackmore Village Heritage Association
Legally compliant? Not specified
Representation Summary:
There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
Change suggested by respondent:
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blackmore's inclusion in the LDP solely. Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is hereby re-submitted. Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Full text:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
Section 08
Policy NE06 8.5-8.64
Para 8.85 (iv)
Para 8.90
Para 8.101
Policy NE13
Section 09
Policy R25, 9.197-9.200
Policy R26, 9.201-204
The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
1. There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
2. BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
3. The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
4. There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
5. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
6. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
7. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
8. The access off/from Redrose Lane is entirely unsuitable for this volume of traffic movements.
9. The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
10. Both fields (R25 and R26) are teeming with wildlife - hundreds of birds nest in the hedgerows within and around the fields. We have photographic evidence (stills and videos) of certain protected species (bats, Barn Owls, Great Crested Newts).
Proposed modifications
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blckmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.
Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is herby re-submitted.
Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Why attend Examination in person?
As Chairman of he "Blackmore Village Heritage Association", I wish to present our own vision for our village based on what Blackmore actually needs.
There will be a form of "Neighbourhood Plan" available, which will significantly update the attached village survey dated 2018.
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
POLICY R25: LAND NORTH OF WOOLLARD WAY
Respondent: Blackmore Village Heritage Association
Legally compliant? Not specified
Representation Summary:
BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
Change suggested by respondent:
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blackmore's inclusion in the LDP solely. Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is hereby re-submitted. Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Full text:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
Section 08
Policy NE06 8.5-8.64
Para 8.85 (iv)
Para 8.90
Para 8.101
Policy NE13
Section 09
Policy R25, 9.197-9.200
Policy R26, 9.201-204
The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
1. There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
2. BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
3. The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
4. There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
5. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
6. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
7. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
8. The access off/from Redrose Lane is entirely unsuitable for this volume of traffic movements.
9. The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
10. Both fields (R25 and R26) are teeming with wildlife - hundreds of birds nest in the hedgerows within and around the fields. We have photographic evidence (stills and videos) of certain protected species (bats, Barn Owls, Great Crested Newts).
Proposed modifications
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blckmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.
Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is herby re-submitted.
Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Why attend Examination in person?
As Chairman of he "Blackmore Village Heritage Association", I wish to present our own vision for our village based on what Blackmore actually needs.
There will be a form of "Neighbourhood Plan" available, which will significantly update the attached village survey dated 2018.
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
POLICY R26: LAND NORTH OF ORCHARD PIECE
Respondent: Blackmore Village Heritage Association
Legally compliant? Not specified
Representation Summary:
BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
Change suggested by respondent:
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blackmore's inclusion in the LDP solely. Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is hereby re-submitted. Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Full text:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
Section 08
Policy NE06 8.5-8.64
Para 8.85 (iv)
Para 8.90
Para 8.101
Policy NE13
Section 09
Policy R25, 9.197-9.200
Policy R26, 9.201-204
The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
1. There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
2. BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
3. The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
4. There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
5. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
6. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
7. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
8. The access off/from Redrose Lane is entirely unsuitable for this volume of traffic movements.
9. The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
10. Both fields (R25 and R26) are teeming with wildlife - hundreds of birds nest in the hedgerows within and around the fields. We have photographic evidence (stills and videos) of certain protected species (bats, Barn Owls, Great Crested Newts).
Proposed modifications
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blckmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.
Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is herby re-submitted.
Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Why attend Examination in person?
As Chairman of he "Blackmore Village Heritage Association", I wish to present our own vision for our village based on what Blackmore actually needs.
There will be a form of "Neighbourhood Plan" available, which will significantly update the attached village survey dated 2018.
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
POLICY R25: LAND NORTH OF WOOLLARD WAY
Respondent: Blackmore Village Heritage Association
Legally compliant? Not specified
Representation Summary:
The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
Change suggested by respondent:
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blackmore's inclusion in the LDP solely. Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is hereby re-submitted. Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Full text:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
Section 08
Policy NE06 8.5-8.64
Para 8.85 (iv)
Para 8.90
Para 8.101
Policy NE13
Section 09
Policy R25, 9.197-9.200
Policy R26, 9.201-204
The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
1. There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
2. BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
3. The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
4. There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
5. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
6. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
7. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
8. The access off/from Redrose Lane is entirely unsuitable for this volume of traffic movements.
9. The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
10. Both fields (R25 and R26) are teeming with wildlife - hundreds of birds nest in the hedgerows within and around the fields. We have photographic evidence (stills and videos) of certain protected species (bats, Barn Owls, Great Crested Newts).
Proposed modifications
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blckmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.
Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is herby re-submitted.
Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Why attend Examination in person?
As Chairman of he "Blackmore Village Heritage Association", I wish to present our own vision for our village based on what Blackmore actually needs.
There will be a form of "Neighbourhood Plan" available, which will significantly update the attached village survey dated 2018.
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
POLICY R26: LAND NORTH OF ORCHARD PIECE
Respondent: Blackmore Village Heritage Association
Legally compliant? Not specified
Representation Summary:
The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
Change suggested by respondent:
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blackmore's inclusion in the LDP solely. Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is hereby re-submitted. Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Full text:
Section 4
Policy SP01 - D(a), D(f)
Paragraphs 4.2and 4.9
Policy SP02
Section 08
Policy NE06 8.5-8.64
Para 8.85 (iv)
Para 8.90
Para 8.101
Policy NE13
Section 09
Policy R25, 9.197-9.200
Policy R26, 9.201-204
The plan is deficient in respect of Blackmore village and unsound on all 4 tests in particular:
1. There is no clear 'strategy ' for the villages including Blackmore, in the north of the borough.
2. BBC has not consulted adequately with Epping Forest District Council. Over houses being constructed and/or planned close to Blackmore village.
3. The principle of residential development off of Redrose Lane is wrong, Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services and infrastructure (The school is full, the doctors surgery is Doddinghurst is already over subscribed inadequate bus service, narrow lanes and already dangerous parking, sewerage system is overloaded already etc).
4. There are more suitable and or sustainable locations, eg urban extensions of Brentwood (eg Honeypot Lane), and the locations in Blackmore so not promote sustainable development.
5. BBC has not demonstrated that there are other brownfield sites that are available and which should take priority over the Greenfield/Green Belt land off of Redrose Lane.
6. BBC has failed to demonstrate that the required housing could not be met by increasing housing density on other (allocated) sites.
7. There has been no 'housing needs survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore village is included in the LDP.
8. The access off/from Redrose Lane is entirely unsuitable for this volume of traffic movements.
9. The entire village is prone to severe flooding, and sites R25 and R26 are both liable to flood. Building on this land will only increase the flood risk elsewhere in the village.
10. Both fields (R25 and R26) are teeming with wildlife - hundreds of birds nest in the hedgerows within and around the fields. We have photographic evidence (stills and videos) of certain protected species (bats, Barn Owls, Great Crested Newts).
Proposed modifications
The plan overall is not the issue- I am challenging policies R25 and R26/Blckmore's inclusion in the LDP solely.
Please refer to the attached village survey of July 2018, which is herby re-submitted.
Blackmore Village Heritage Association will have an updated "Neighbourhood Plan" available.
Why attend Examination in person?
As Chairman of he "Blackmore Village Heritage Association", I wish to present our own vision for our village based on what Blackmore actually needs.
There will be a form of "Neighbourhood Plan" available, which will significantly update the attached village survey dated 2018.
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our
help guide.
