Housing Requirement should be recalculated. This will result in the requirement to identify additional site allocations.

1. Introduction
1.1 This representation has been is made towards the Brentwood Local Plan Pre-Submission Regulation 19 consultation document, on behalf of our client, RS2 Properties Ltd, who is seeking to promote land at 41 Shenfield Road through the Local Plan process for residential development. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 1.
1.2 The site comprises the dwelling at No.41 Shenfield Road, which is sited within the residential area and outside the Green Belt. Land to the south of the dwelling lies within the Green Belt, albeit abutting the residential area on its southern, western and eastern boundaries.
1.3 Shenfield Road is the main road which links the centre of Brentwood with the A12, which runs through Essex into London. The site lies within a clearly sustainable location, lying 600m from the town centre; 1200m from the train station; adjacent to the Brentwood Sports Ground and Cricket Club; 1200m from primary schools and sports pitches on Sawyers Hall Lane; 300m from Brentwood Community Hospital; and 400m from Brentwood School.
1.4 In all respects, the site lies within a sustainable location and development on this site would comply with the Government's core planning principle to focus development in locations which are sustainable.
1.5 A development on this site of between 30-65 dwellings per hectare (as Policy H14 of the existing Local Plan would require) could result in a scheme of between 21-46 dwellings. RS2 Properties Ltd have not identified any site-specific constraints which would preclude development on this site coming forward and would bring forward development on this site within five years.
1.6 This representation follows the submission of the site, during the 'Call for Sites' in November 2017, as a site suitable for residential development, and representations made in March 2018 in respect of the Preferred Site Allocations (Regulation 18). A copy of these earlier representations are provided as Appendix 2.
1.7 These representations have adopted the format of the Local Plan comments form and are based around answering the following questions:
* Question 5: Please provide details of either:
Why you consider the Plan to be sound, legally compliant, or adheres to the Duty to Cooperate; or
Why you consider that the Local Plan is unsound, is not legally compliant, or fails to comply with the Duty to Cooperate;
* Question 6: Please set out what modification(s) you consider necessary to make the Local Plan sound or legally compliant, having regard to the matters that you identified above; and
* Question 8: If you wish to participate at the oral part of the Examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary.
2. Question 5
Please provide details of either: Why you consider the Plan to be sound, legally compliant, or adheres to the Duty to Cooperate; or
Why you consider that the Local Plan is unsound, is not legally compliant, or fails to comply with the Duty to Cooperate.
STRATEGIC POLICY SP02: Managing Growth
2.1 It is not considered that the Local Plan is sound, as the Council's Housing Requirement is not considered to have been calculated correctly.
2.2 The Planning Practice Guidance section on 'Housing and economic needs assessment', which was updated on 20 February 2019, confirms at 'Paragraph: 005 Reference ID: 2a-005- 20190220' that 2014 based household projections should be used as the baseline for the 'standard method'. The reason given for this approach is to provide stability for planning authorities and communities, ensure that historic under-delivery and declining affordability are reflected, and to be consistent with the Government's objective of significantly boosting the supply of homes.
2.3 Paragraph 4.13 of the Local Plan confirms that Council's 'housing requirement figure' to be 350 dwellings per year. With a 20% uplift, the total annual housing requirement is 456 dwellings per year.
2.4 This housing requirement has been calculated within the Strategic Housing Market Assessment, published in October 2018 (i.e. before the latest Planning Practice Guidance assessment). This Assessment confirms that the housing requirement has been calculated using the 2016 population projections as a starting point (see paragraph 8.26 of the SHMA in particular). Accordingly, the Plan cannot be considered to be sound on this basis.
2.5 An indicative assessment of housing need based on the Standard Method using the 2014 population projections was published in September 2017. This stated that Brentwood's housing need, based on the Standard Method, was 454 dwellings per annum. Applying the 20% uplift to this figure would result in a housing requirement of 545 homes per year, or a total of 9,262 homes during the plan period 2016-2033.
2.6 This is an increase of 1,510 dwellings from the housing requirement calculated by the SHMA calculations which uses the 2016 population projections as a starting point.
2.7 Accordingly, we consider that the Inspector should, during the Examination, request that Brentwood update its evidence base, and its housing requirement, to reflect the 2014 based population projections. This will result in the requirement to identify additional site allocations, as considered further below.
2.8 With regards to Strategic Policy SP02, therefore, it is not considered that the Brentwood Local Plan - Pre-Submission Document can be considered to be sound as, in accordance with paragraph 35 of the NPPF, the Plan has not consistent with National Policy in its use of 2016 population projections to determine its housing requirement. In this respect, the plan has also not been positively prepared as it will not, as a minimum, meet its objectively assessed needs.
Chapter 9 - Site Allocations & Local Development Plan Housing Trajectory
2.9 The sites that the Borough Council have identified for residential development are detailed at Chapter 9 of the Local Plan. Table 4.2 of the Local Plan identifies that the allocations total 6,088 dwellings, with the remaining dwellings comprising completions between 2016/17 & 2017/18 (363 dwellings); extant permissions (926 dwellings); and the windfall allowance between 2023-2033 (410 dwellings).
2.10 Accordingly, should the Inspector agree with our assessment that Brentwood's housing requirement is not sound, and the housing requirement thus increases, it would therefore be necessary to identify additional sites for allocation.
2.11 The following section of this Representation provides support for land at 41 Shenfield Road, Brentwood, to be allocated for residential development.
2.12 Notwithstanding this, it is considered that additional sites will be required in any event to ensure the housing requirement is met. Appendix 1 of the Local Plan sets out the Council's anticipated Housing Trajectory, which we do not agree with. The Council's calculations of when sites will be delivered, and how many dwellings will be delivered each year, appears overly ambitious.
2.13 In particular, Dunton Hills Garden Village is identified as being capable of delivering 2,700 dwellings during the plan period, with the site being capable of delivering 100 dwellings starting from 2022/23 (i.e. within 3 years), and then between 150 - 300 dwellings each year thereafter.
2.14 This level of growth from such a strategic allocation does not appear realistic. For example, it is unlikely that the Local Plan will be adopted until 2020 at the earliest (the Council's Local Development Scheme suggests that the plan would be adopted in Q3 2019, but the timescales have slipped as the Plan was due to have been submitted in Q1 2019).
2.15 For a scheme of Dunton Hills, and the level of constraints that it faces, and the vast range of application documents that would be required, including Environmental Assessment, it is realistic to assume that an outline application could take 9-12 months to be determined. Given the level of information that would be required to support the application (Consultant Reports, EA, Public/Statutory Consultation), therefore, it is realistic and reasonable to assume that it may take upto two years, from adoption of the plan in 2020, for an outline planning application to be granted planning permission.
2.16 There would then, of course, follow further applications to discharge conditions and Reserved Matters applications, none of which would be straight forward and would require similar levels of detail to an Outline Planning Application. This process could, itself, take 9-12 months, if not longer.
2.17 Accordingly, it is realistic to assume that, from adoption, it would take close to three years before planning permissions have been approved, and conditions discharged, such that development can commence on site. This would mean that, at the earliest, dwellings will not be brought forward until 2023/24, and not 2022/23 as considered by the Housing Trajectory. Such delays in the Council's Housing Trajectory will have inevitable consequences on the Local Authority being able to deliver its housing requirement during the Plan Period.
2.18 As such, it is considered that additional sites will be required during the Plan Period to ensure that a) the Local Authority is able to deliver its housing requirement during the Plan Period (notwithstanding our view that the Council has not calculated its correct requirement); and b) that additional sites will be required to allow for flexibility in allocated sites not being brought forward within the timescales identified within the Housing Trajectory.
2.19 Furthermore, it is considered that the Local Plan is not sound as it does not comply with paragraph 68 of the NPPF.
2.20 Paragraph 59 of the NPPF requires Local Authorities to 'boost significantly' the supply of housing and must, "ensure choice and competition in the market for land". This involves boosting provision of housing from a variety of sources, including small sites which are suitable for smaller housebuilders.
2.21 This is reinforced by paragraph 68 of the revised NPPF, which confirms that small sites make an important contribution to meeting housing requirements and confirms that planning authorities should accommodate at least 10% of their housing requirement on sites no larger than one hectare.
2.22 The Council's housing strategy only allocates 5% on sites no larger than one hectare. The NPPF confirms that smaller sites make an important contribution to meeting housing requirement, in part as they are able to be developed quickly and are able to therefore contribute towards housing supply whilst Strategic Sites are being brought forward in the background.
2.23 Accordingly, it is considered that, as identified above with the Dunton Hills Strategic Allocation, that a greater percentage of smaller sites (such as land at 41 Shenfield Road) should be identified for allocation.
2.24 We would therefore request that the Local Authority reviews its housing supply, and particularly its approach to small sites, and allocate suitable smaller sites which can be brought forward early in the plan period.
2.25 With regards to the Council's approach to housing allocations and its housing trajectory, therefore, it is not considered that the Brentwood Local Plan - Pre-Submission Document can be considered to be sound as, in accordance with paragraph 35 of the NPPF, the Local Plan has not been positively prepared (as it is unlikely that the strategy will ensure that, as a minimum, the plan will meet the Council's Objectively Assessed Need), and is not consistent with national policy in its approach to allocated development on smaller sites.
3. Question 6
Question 6: Please set out what modification(s) you consider necessary to make the Local Plan sound or legally compliant, having regard to the matters that you identified above.
STRATEGIC POLICY SP02: Managing Growth
3.1 With regards to Section 2, it is considered that Brentwood Borough Council will need to revisit its evidence base to determine a housing requirement which uses the 2014 population projections as a starting point. This will result in a larger housing requirement, with our estimate based on the indicative Standard Method being approximately 545 homes per year, or a total of 9,262 homes during the plan period 2016-2033.
Chapter 9 - Site Allocations & Local Development Plan Housing Trajectory
3.2 It is considered that additional sites should be allocated to ensure that the Local Authority can meet its housing requirement to 2033. Even if the Inspector agree with the Council's objectively assessed need, it is likely that additional sites will be required to be brought forward given the Council's overly optimistic approach to its housing trajectory, particularly with regards to Dunton Hills Garden Village.
3.3 Furthermore, the Local Plan does not allocate a sufficient number of 'small sites' to contribute towards the housing requirement, as per paragraph 68 of the NPPF.
3.4 It is considered that land at 41 Shenfield Road is an appropriate site for residential development and should be allocated for between 21-46 dwellings.
3.5 The site includes 41 Shenfield Road, which is sited within the residential area and outside of the Green Belt, and land to the north of the swelling, which lies within the Green Belt. This part of the site is bordered to the south and east by residential development on Shenfield Road and Glanmead.
3.6 There can be no dispute that the site lies within a sustainable location, lying within walking distance of Brentwood Town Centre, Brentwood Rail Station, Brentwood Community Hospital and Brentwood School. The site is therefore a suitable site for residential development, other than for the fact that it lies with the Green Belt and is therefore, technically within the Countryside (albeit bordered on two boundaries by residential development, and entirely enclosed by mature landscaping and woodland on other boundaries).
3.7 Brentwood Borough Council published parts 1 & 2 of its Green Belt study in January 2018. These initial parts showed 41 Shenfield Road lying on the southern edge of 'Parcel 42 Northwest of Shenfield'. The report when assessing the parcel as a whole, confirms that it abuts the large built up area, and that development within this parcel would be seen as an 'urban extension'.
3.8 The Green Belt Study Part 3 - "Assessment of Potential Housing, Employment and Mixed Use Sites in the Green Belt and their Relative Contribution to the Purposes of the Green Belt Designation" - was published in November 2018, and subsequently amended in January 2019. This part of the Green Belt Study assesses the potential Site Allocations against the purposes of the Green Belt.
3.9 41 Shenfield Road is included within Part 3 as site reference 320, with the report considering that the site makes a 'moderate' contribution towards the Green Belt. The report confirms that the site is a relatively small site, contained by woodland cover and adjacent to Shenfield.
3.10 Our own assessment against the purposes of the Green Belt is given below.
* Purpose 1: to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas The site lies within the urban area of Brentwood, a short distance from the town centre. The site is well constrained by existing built development and mature trees and woodland. Development would be seen as a small infill development and would have a very limited encroachment into the countryside. Existing site boundaries would prevent any further development into the Green Belt, with these boundaries presenting a strong and definite boundary to further development. * Purpose 2: to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another Development on this site would not significantly reduce the countryside gap between Shenfield and Brentwood. The countryside separation between Shenfield and Brentwood would be retained. * Purpose 3: to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment The site has no specific countryside function, being seen as residential gardens within the context of an Urban Settlement. * Purpose 4: to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns The site has a limited relationship with the historic town of Brentwood.
3.11 Accordingly, it is considered that the site is suitable to be released from the Green Belt.
3.12 Furthermore, it is noted that the Borough Council's proposed allocations allocates a number of sites within the Green Belt which the Green Belt Study confirms as making a 'moderate' contribution to the Green Belt, similar to 41 Shenfield Road, including:
* Site R23 Brizes Corner Field, Kelvedon Hatch (23 dwellings);
* Site R25 Land north of Woolard Way, Blackmore (40 dwellings); and
* Site R26 Land north of Orchard Piece, Blackmore (30 dwellings).
3.13 The spatial strategy shown within the plan as 'Figure 5' confirms that the site lies within a 'Main Town'. Land at 41 Shenfield Road is therefore more sequentially preferable for development than a number of Preferred Site Allocations, such as those within the villages of Ingatestone, Kelvedon Hatch and West Thorndon, and to those identified at paragraph 3.12 of this representation.
3.14 Furthermore, paragraph 3.23 of the Pre-Submission Local Plan confirms that Brentwood will deliver development in terms of a sequential land use test, with land within Urban Areas preferred to all other land. There can be no doubt that land at 41 Shenfield Road lies within the urban area of Brentwood.
.15 Those sites listed at paragraph 3.12 of this representation are located within villages and the
rural area which can offer, as a result of their location, far fewer services and facilities than land at 41 Shenfield Road. These sites, especially, are less sequentially preferable than the site at 41 Shenfield Road.
3.16 Accordingly, we would request that the Local Plan be modified to allocate Land at 41 Shenfield Road for residential development, for 24 dwellings, in accordance with Policy HP03 of the Pre- Submission Local Plan which confirms that residential development proposals will generally be expected to achieve a net density of at least 35 dwellings per hectare or higher. Given the sites location within such a sustainable location, it is considered that 35dph on the site is appropriate and would accord with paragraph 123 of the NPPF which confirms that planning policies should avoid homes being built at low densities, and to ensure that development make optimal use of the potential of each site.
4. Question 8
If you wish to participate at the oral part of the Examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary.
4.1 RS2 Properties Ltd would welcome the opportunity to present oral evidence to the Inspector, if required, in order to provide further detail in respect of the proposed allocation and to provide further evidence in respect of application timescales and the deliverability of development on this site.
4.2 We would therefore like to participate in the examination process.
5. Summary & Conclusions
5.1 RS2 Properties Ltd is presenting the Council and Local Plan Inspector with a site that is capable of delivering 24 dwellings, within a sustainable location. The site is suitable, available, achievable within five years, is in a highly sustainable location and performs a similar contribution to Green Belt purposes to many of the proposed site allocation within the Pre- Submission Plan. The site is sequentially preferable to these sites, given its location within the Urban Area and its location, therefore, to many shops and services and accessibility to public transport.
5.2 The site and its promoter meet the Governments aspirations and direction of travel in policy in terms of supporting the delivery of much needed small and medium sites to boost significantly the supply of housing and provide choice and competition as required by the NPPF, and which has been reinforced by the revised NPPF.
5.3 It is considered that additional smaller sites need to be allocated to allow for flexibility in the Council's housing supply; and that the Council's OAN may need to be reconsidered in light of the proposed Standard Method for calculating housing supply.
5.4 We therefore urge the Local Authority and Local Plan Inspector to recognise the Governments strategy and allocate the land at 41 Shenfield Road, Brentwood, Essex, CM15 8EN for delivery of 24 dwellings in the first five years of the Plan period.
5.5 Please record this representation as a formal submission towards the Local Plan evidence base and drafting stages and we look forward to the opportunity to presenting evidence to the Local Plan Inspector and answering any questions that the Inspector may have with regards to residential development on this site.

1. Introduction
1.1 This representation has been is made towards the Brentwood Local Plan Pre-Submission Regulation 19 consultation document, on behalf of our client, RS2 Properties Ltd, who is seeking to promote land at 41 Shenfield Road through the Local Plan process for residential development. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 1.
1.2 The site comprises the dwelling at No.41 Shenfield Road, which is sited within the residential area and outside the Green Belt. Land to the south of the dwelling lies within the Green Belt, albeit abutting the residential area on its southern, western and eastern boundaries.
1.3 Shenfield Road is the main road which links the centre of Brentwood with the A12, which runs through Essex into London. The site lies within a clearly sustainable location, lying 600m from the town centre; 1200m from the train station; adjacent to the Brentwood Sports Ground and Cricket Club; 1200m from primary schools and sports pitches on Sawyers Hall Lane; 300m from Brentwood Community Hospital; and 400m from Brentwood School.
1.4 In all respects, the site lies within a sustainable location and development on this site would comply with the Government's core planning principle to focus development in locations which are sustainable.
1.5 A development on this site of between 30-65 dwellings per hectare (as Policy H14 of the existing Local Plan would require) could result in a scheme of between 21-46 dwellings. RS2 Properties Ltd have not identified any site-specific constraints which would preclude development on this site coming forward and would bring forward development on this site within five years.
1.6 This representation follows the submission of the site, during the 'Call for Sites' in November 2017, as a site suitable for residential development, and representations made in March 2018 in respect of the Preferred Site Allocations (Regulation 18). A copy of these earlier representations are provided as Appendix 2.
1.7 These representations have adopted the format of the Local Plan comments form and are based around answering the following questions:
* Question 5: Please provide details of either:
Why you consider the Plan to be sound, legally compliant, or adheres to the Duty to Cooperate; or
Why you consider that the Local Plan is unsound, is not legally compliant, or fails to comply with the Duty to Cooperate;
* Question 6: Please set out what modification(s) you consider necessary to make the Local Plan sound or legally compliant, having regard to the matters that you identified above; and
* Question 8: If you wish to participate at the oral part of the Examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary.
2. Question 5
Please provide details of either: Why you consider the Plan to be sound, legally compliant, or adheres to the Duty to Cooperate; or
Why you consider that the Local Plan is unsound, is not legally compliant, or fails to comply with the Duty to Cooperate.
STRATEGIC POLICY SP02: Managing Growth
2.1 It is not considered that the Local Plan is sound, as the Council's Housing Requirement is not considered to have been calculated correctly.
2.2 The Planning Practice Guidance section on 'Housing and economic needs assessment', which was updated on 20 February 2019, confirms at 'Paragraph: 005 Reference ID: 2a-005- 20190220' that 2014 based household projections should be used as the baseline for the 'standard method'. The reason given for this approach is to provide stability for planning authorities and communities, ensure that historic under-delivery and declining affordability are reflected, and to be consistent with the Government's objective of significantly boosting the supply of homes.
2.3 Paragraph 4.13 of the Local Plan confirms that Council's 'housing requirement figure' to be 350 dwellings per year. With a 20% uplift, the total annual housing requirement is 456 dwellings per year.
2.4 This housing requirement has been calculated within the Strategic Housing Market Assessment, published in October 2018 (i.e. before the latest Planning Practice Guidance assessment). This Assessment confirms that the housing requirement has been calculated using the 2016 population projections as a starting point (see paragraph 8.26 of the SHMA in particular). Accordingly, the Plan cannot be considered to be sound on this basis.
2.5 An indicative assessment of housing need based on the Standard Method using the 2014 population projections was published in September 2017. This stated that Brentwood's housing need, based on the Standard Method, was 454 dwellings per annum. Applying the 20% uplift to this figure would result in a housing requirement of 545 homes per year, or a total of 9,262 homes during the plan period 2016-2033.
2.6 This is an increase of 1,510 dwellings from the housing requirement calculated by the SHMA calculations which uses the 2016 population projections as a starting point.
2.7 Accordingly, we consider that the Inspector should, during the Examination, request that Brentwood update its evidence base, and its housing requirement, to reflect the 2014 based population projections. This will result in the requirement to identify additional site allocations, as considered further below.
2.8 With regards to Strategic Policy SP02, therefore, it is not considered that the Brentwood Local Plan - Pre-Submission Document can be considered to be sound as, in accordance with paragraph 35 of the NPPF, the Plan has not consistent with National Policy in its use of 2016 population projections to determine its housing requirement. In this respect, the plan has also not been positively prepared as it will not, as a minimum, meet its objectively assessed needs.
Chapter 9 - Site Allocations & Local Development Plan Housing Trajectory
2.9 The sites that the Borough Council have identified for residential development are detailed at Chapter 9 of the Local Plan. Table 4.2 of the Local Plan identifies that the allocations total 6,088 dwellings, with the remaining dwellings comprising completions between 2016/17 & 2017/18 (363 dwellings); extant permissions (926 dwellings); and the windfall allowance between 2023-2033 (410 dwellings).
2.10 Accordingly, should the Inspector agree with our assessment that Brentwood's housing requirement is not sound, and the housing requirement thus increases, it would therefore be necessary to identify additional sites for allocation.
2.11 The following section of this Representation provides support for land at 41 Shenfield Road, Brentwood, to be allocated for residential development.
2.12 Notwithstanding this, it is considered that additional sites will be required in any event to ensure the housing requirement is met. Appendix 1 of the Local Plan sets out the Council's anticipated Housing Trajectory, which we do not agree with. The Council's calculations of when sites will be delivered, and how many dwellings will be delivered each year, appears overly ambitious.
2.13 In particular, Dunton Hills Garden Village is identified as being capable of delivering 2,700 dwellings during the plan period, with the site being capable of delivering 100 dwellings starting from 2022/23 (i.e. within 3 years), and then between 150 - 300 dwellings each year thereafter.
2.14 This level of growth from such a strategic allocation does not appear realistic. For example, it is unlikely that the Local Plan will be adopted until 2020 at the earliest (the Council's Local Development Scheme suggests that the plan would be adopted in Q3 2019, but the timescales have slipped as the Plan was due to have been submitted in Q1 2019).
2.15 For a scheme of Dunton Hills, and the level of constraints that it faces, and the vast range of application documents that would be required, including Environmental Assessment, it is realistic to assume that an outline application could take 9-12 months to be determined. Given the level of information that would be required to support the application (Consultant Reports, EA, Public/Statutory Consultation), therefore, it is realistic and reasonable to assume that it may take upto two years, from adoption of the plan in 2020, for an outline planning application to be granted planning permission.
2.16 There would then, of course, follow further applications to discharge conditions and Reserved Matters applications, none of which would be straight forward and would require similar levels of detail to an Outline Planning Application. This process could, itself, take 9-12 months, if not longer.
2.17 Accordingly, it is realistic to assume that, from adoption, it would take close to three years before planning permissions have been approved, and conditions discharged, such that development can commence on site. This would mean that, at the earliest, dwellings will not be brought forward until 2023/24, and not 2022/23 as considered by the Housing Trajectory. Such delays in the Council's Housing Trajectory will have inevitable consequences on the Local Authority being able to deliver its housing requirement during the Plan Period.
2.18 As such, it is considered that additional sites will be required during the Plan Period to ensure that a) the Local Authority is able to deliver its housing requirement during the Plan Period (notwithstanding our view that the Council has not calculated its correct requirement); and b) that additional sites will be required to allow for flexibility in allocated sites not being brought forward within the timescales identified within the Housing Trajectory.
2.19 Furthermore, it is considered that the Local Plan is not sound as it does not comply with paragraph 68 of the NPPF.
2.20 Paragraph 59 of the NPPF requires Local Authorities to 'boost significantly' the supply of housing and must, "ensure choice and competition in the market for land". This involves boosting provision of housing from a variety of sources, including small sites which are suitable for smaller housebuilders.
2.21 This is reinforced by paragraph 68 of the revised NPPF, which confirms that small sites make an important contribution to meeting housing requirements and confirms that planning authorities should accommodate at least 10% of their housing requirement on sites no larger than one hectare.
2.22 The Council's housing strategy only allocates 5% on sites no larger than one hectare. The NPPF confirms that smaller sites make an important contribution to meeting housing requirement, in part as they are able to be developed quickly and are able to therefore contribute towards housing supply whilst Strategic Sites are being brought forward in the background.
2.23 Accordingly, it is considered that, as identified above with the Dunton Hills Strategic Allocation, that a greater percentage of smaller sites (such as land at 41 Shenfield Road) should be identified for allocation.
2.24 We would therefore request that the Local Authority reviews its housing supply, and particularly its approach to small sites, and allocate suitable smaller sites which can be brought forward early in the plan period.
2.25 With regards to the Council's approach to housing allocations and its housing trajectory, therefore, it is not considered that the Brentwood Local Plan - Pre-Submission Document can be considered to be sound as, in accordance with paragraph 35 of the NPPF, the Local Plan has not been positively prepared (as it is unlikely that the strategy will ensure that, as a minimum, the plan will meet the Council's Objectively Assessed Need), and is not consistent with national policy in its approach to allocated development on smaller sites.
3. Question 6
Question 6: Please set out what modification(s) you consider necessary to make the Local Plan sound or legally compliant, having regard to the matters that you identified above.
STRATEGIC POLICY SP02: Managing Growth
3.1 With regards to Section 2, it is considered that Brentwood Borough Council will need to revisit its evidence base to determine a housing requirement which uses the 2014 population projections as a starting point. This will result in a larger housing requirement, with our estimate based on the indicative Standard Method being approximately 545 homes per year, or a total of 9,262 homes during the plan period 2016-2033.
Chapter 9 - Site Allocations & Local Development Plan Housing Trajectory
3.2 It is considered that additional sites should be allocated to ensure that the Local Authority can meet its housing requirement to 2033. Even if the Inspector agree with the Council's objectively assessed need, it is likely that additional sites will be required to be brought forward given the Council's overly optimistic approach to its housing trajectory, particularly with regards to Dunton Hills Garden Village.
3.3 Furthermore, the Local Plan does not allocate a sufficient number of 'small sites' to contribute towards the housing requirement, as per paragraph 68 of the NPPF.
3.4 It is considered that land at 41 Shenfield Road is an appropriate site for residential development and should be allocated for between 21-46 dwellings.
3.5 The site includes 41 Shenfield Road, which is sited within the residential area and outside of the Green Belt, and land to the north of the swelling, which lies within the Green Belt. This part of the site is bordered to the south and east by residential development on Shenfield Road and Glanmead.
3.6 There can be no dispute that the site lies within a sustainable location, lying within walking distance of Brentwood Town Centre, Brentwood Rail Station, Brentwood Community Hospital and Brentwood School. The site is therefore a suitable site for residential development, other than for the fact that it lies with the Green Belt and is therefore, technically within the Countryside (albeit bordered on two boundaries by residential development, and entirely enclosed by mature landscaping and woodland on other boundaries).
3.7 Brentwood Borough Council published parts 1 & 2 of its Green Belt study in January 2018. These initial parts showed 41 Shenfield Road lying on the southern edge of 'Parcel 42 Northwest of Shenfield'. The report when assessing the parcel as a whole, confirms that it abuts the large built up area, and that development within this parcel would be seen as an 'urban extension'.
3.8 The Green Belt Study Part 3 - "Assessment of Potential Housing, Employment and Mixed Use Sites in the Green Belt and their Relative Contribution to the Purposes of the Green Belt Designation" - was published in November 2018, and subsequently amended in January 2019. This part of the Green Belt Study assesses the potential Site Allocations against the purposes of the Green Belt.
3.9 41 Shenfield Road is included within Part 3 as site reference 320, with the report considering that the site makes a 'moderate' contribution towards the Green Belt. The report confirms that the site is a relatively small site, contained by woodland cover and adjacent to Shenfield.
3.10 Our own assessment against the purposes of the Green Belt is given below.
* Purpose 1: to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas The site lies within the urban area of Brentwood, a short distance from the town centre. The site is well constrained by existing built development and mature trees and woodland. Development would be seen as a small infill development and would have a very limited encroachment into the countryside. Existing site boundaries would prevent any further development into the Green Belt, with these boundaries presenting a strong and definite boundary to further development. * Purpose 2: to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another Development on this site would not significantly reduce the countryside gap between Shenfield and Brentwood. The countryside separation between Shenfield and Brentwood would be retained. * Purpose 3: to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment The site has no specific countryside function, being seen as residential gardens within the context of an Urban Settlement. * Purpose 4: to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns The site has a limited relationship with the historic town of Brentwood.
3.11 Accordingly, it is considered that the site is suitable to be released from the Green Belt.
3.12 Furthermore, it is noted that the Borough Council's proposed allocations allocates a number of sites within the Green Belt which the Green Belt Study confirms as making a 'moderate' contribution to the Green Belt, similar to 41 Shenfield Road, including:
* Site R23 Brizes Corner Field, Kelvedon Hatch (23 dwellings);
* Site R25 Land north of Woolard Way, Blackmore (40 dwellings); and
* Site R26 Land north of Orchard Piece, Blackmore (30 dwellings).
3.13 The spatial strategy shown within the plan as 'Figure 5' confirms that the site lies within a 'Main Town'. Land at 41 Shenfield Road is therefore more sequentially preferable for development than a number of Preferred Site Allocations, such as those within the villages of Ingatestone, Kelvedon Hatch and West Thorndon, and to those identified at paragraph 3.12 of this representation.
3.14 Furthermore, paragraph 3.23 of the Pre-Submission Local Plan confirms that Brentwood will deliver development in terms of a sequential land use test, with land within Urban Areas preferred to all other land. There can be no doubt that land at 41 Shenfield Road lies within the urban area of Brentwood.
.15 Those sites listed at paragraph 3.12 of this representation are located within villages and the
rural area which can offer, as a result of their location, far fewer services and facilities than land at 41 Shenfield Road. These sites, especially, are less sequentially preferable than the site at 41 Shenfield Road.
3.16 Accordingly, we would request that the Local Plan be modified to allocate Land at 41 Shenfield Road for residential development, for 24 dwellings, in accordance with Policy HP03 of the Pre- Submission Local Plan which confirms that residential development proposals will generally be expected to achieve a net density of at least 35 dwellings per hectare or higher. Given the sites location within such a sustainable location, it is considered that 35dph on the site is appropriate and would accord with paragraph 123 of the NPPF which confirms that planning policies should avoid homes being built at low densities, and to ensure that development make optimal use of the potential of each site.
4. Question 8
If you wish to participate at the oral part of the Examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary.
4.1 RS2 Properties Ltd would welcome the opportunity to present oral evidence to the Inspector, if required, in order to provide further detail in respect of the proposed allocation and to provide further evidence in respect of application timescales and the deliverability of development on this site.
4.2 We would therefore like to participate in the examination process.
5. Summary & Conclusions
5.1 RS2 Properties Ltd is presenting the Council and Local Plan Inspector with a site that is capable of delivering 24 dwellings, within a sustainable location. The site is suitable, available, achievable within five years, is in a highly sustainable location and performs a similar contribution to Green Belt purposes to many of the proposed site allocation within the Pre- Submission Plan. The site is sequentially preferable to these sites, given its location within the Urban Area and its location, therefore, to many shops and services and accessibility to public transport.
5.2 The site and its promoter meet the Governments aspirations and direction of travel in policy in terms of supporting the delivery of much needed small and medium sites to boost significantly the supply of housing and provide choice and competition as required by the NPPF, and which has been reinforced by the revised NPPF.
5.3 It is considered that additional smaller sites need to be allocated to allow for flexibility in the Council's housing supply; and that the Council's OAN may need to be reconsidered in light of the proposed Standard Method for calculating housing supply.
5.4 We therefore urge the Local Authority and Local Plan Inspector to recognise the Governments strategy and allocate the land at 41 Shenfield Road, Brentwood, Essex, CM15 8EN for delivery of 24 dwellings in the first five years of the Plan period.
5.5 Please record this representation as a formal submission towards the Local Plan evidence base and drafting stages and we look forward to the opportunity to presenting evidence to the Local Plan Inspector and answering any questions that the Inspector may have with regards to residential development on this site.

the Local Authority reviews its housing supply, and particularly its approach to small sites, and allocate suitable smaller sites which can be brought forward early in the plan period.

1. Introduction
1.1 This representation has been is made towards the Brentwood Local Plan Pre-Submission Regulation 19 consultation document, on behalf of our client, RS2 Properties Ltd, who is seeking to promote land at 41 Shenfield Road through the Local Plan process for residential development. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 1.
1.2 The site comprises the dwelling at No.41 Shenfield Road, which is sited within the residential area and outside the Green Belt. Land to the south of the dwelling lies within the Green Belt, albeit abutting the residential area on its southern, western and eastern boundaries.
1.3 Shenfield Road is the main road which links the centre of Brentwood with the A12, which runs through Essex into London. The site lies within a clearly sustainable location, lying 600m from the town centre; 1200m from the train station; adjacent to the Brentwood Sports Ground and Cricket Club; 1200m from primary schools and sports pitches on Sawyers Hall Lane; 300m from Brentwood Community Hospital; and 400m from Brentwood School.
1.4 In all respects, the site lies within a sustainable location and development on this site would comply with the Government's core planning principle to focus development in locations which are sustainable.
1.5 A development on this site of between 30-65 dwellings per hectare (as Policy H14 of the existing Local Plan would require) could result in a scheme of between 21-46 dwellings. RS2 Properties Ltd have not identified any site-specific constraints which would preclude development on this site coming forward and would bring forward development on this site within five years.
1.6 This representation follows the submission of the site, during the 'Call for Sites' in November 2017, as a site suitable for residential development, and representations made in March 2018 in respect of the Preferred Site Allocations (Regulation 18). A copy of these earlier representations are provided as Appendix 2.
1.7 These representations have adopted the format of the Local Plan comments form and are based around answering the following questions:
* Question 5: Please provide details of either:
Why you consider the Plan to be sound, legally compliant, or adheres to the Duty to Cooperate; or
Why you consider that the Local Plan is unsound, is not legally compliant, or fails to comply with the Duty to Cooperate;
* Question 6: Please set out what modification(s) you consider necessary to make the Local Plan sound or legally compliant, having regard to the matters that you identified above; and
* Question 8: If you wish to participate at the oral part of the Examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary.
2. Question 5
Please provide details of either: Why you consider the Plan to be sound, legally compliant, or adheres to the Duty to Cooperate; or
Why you consider that the Local Plan is unsound, is not legally compliant, or fails to comply with the Duty to Cooperate.
STRATEGIC POLICY SP02: Managing Growth
2.1 It is not considered that the Local Plan is sound, as the Council's Housing Requirement is not considered to have been calculated correctly.
2.2 The Planning Practice Guidance section on 'Housing and economic needs assessment', which was updated on 20 February 2019, confirms at 'Paragraph: 005 Reference ID: 2a-005- 20190220' that 2014 based household projections should be used as the baseline for the 'standard method'. The reason given for this approach is to provide stability for planning authorities and communities, ensure that historic under-delivery and declining affordability are reflected, and to be consistent with the Government's objective of significantly boosting the supply of homes.
2.3 Paragraph 4.13 of the Local Plan confirms that Council's 'housing requirement figure' to be 350 dwellings per year. With a 20% uplift, the total annual housing requirement is 456 dwellings per year.
2.4 This housing requirement has been calculated within the Strategic Housing Market Assessment, published in October 2018 (i.e. before the latest Planning Practice Guidance assessment). This Assessment confirms that the housing requirement has been calculated using the 2016 population projections as a starting point (see paragraph 8.26 of the SHMA in particular). Accordingly, the Plan cannot be considered to be sound on this basis.
2.5 An indicative assessment of housing need based on the Standard Method using the 2014 population projections was published in September 2017. This stated that Brentwood's housing need, based on the Standard Method, was 454 dwellings per annum. Applying the 20% uplift to this figure would result in a housing requirement of 545 homes per year, or a total of 9,262 homes during the plan period 2016-2033.
2.6 This is an increase of 1,510 dwellings from the housing requirement calculated by the SHMA calculations which uses the 2016 population projections as a starting point.
2.7 Accordingly, we consider that the Inspector should, during the Examination, request that Brentwood update its evidence base, and its housing requirement, to reflect the 2014 based population projections. This will result in the requirement to identify additional site allocations, as considered further below.
2.8 With regards to Strategic Policy SP02, therefore, it is not considered that the Brentwood Local Plan - Pre-Submission Document can be considered to be sound as, in accordance with paragraph 35 of the NPPF, the Plan has not consistent with National Policy in its use of 2016 population projections to determine its housing requirement. In this respect, the plan has also not been positively prepared as it will not, as a minimum, meet its objectively assessed needs.
Chapter 9 - Site Allocations & Local Development Plan Housing Trajectory
2.9 The sites that the Borough Council have identified for residential development are detailed at Chapter 9 of the Local Plan. Table 4.2 of the Local Plan identifies that the allocations total 6,088 dwellings, with the remaining dwellings comprising completions between 2016/17 & 2017/18 (363 dwellings); extant permissions (926 dwellings); and the windfall allowance between 2023-2033 (410 dwellings).
2.10 Accordingly, should the Inspector agree with our assessment that Brentwood's housing requirement is not sound, and the housing requirement thus increases, it would therefore be necessary to identify additional sites for allocation.
2.11 The following section of this Representation provides support for land at 41 Shenfield Road, Brentwood, to be allocated for residential development.
2.12 Notwithstanding this, it is considered that additional sites will be required in any event to ensure the housing requirement is met. Appendix 1 of the Local Plan sets out the Council's anticipated Housing Trajectory, which we do not agree with. The Council's calculations of when sites will be delivered, and how many dwellings will be delivered each year, appears overly ambitious.
2.13 In particular, Dunton Hills Garden Village is identified as being capable of delivering 2,700 dwellings during the plan period, with the site being capable of delivering 100 dwellings starting from 2022/23 (i.e. within 3 years), and then between 150 - 300 dwellings each year thereafter.
2.14 This level of growth from such a strategic allocation does not appear realistic. For example, it is unlikely that the Local Plan will be adopted until 2020 at the earliest (the Council's Local Development Scheme suggests that the plan would be adopted in Q3 2019, but the timescales have slipped as the Plan was due to have been submitted in Q1 2019).
2.15 For a scheme of Dunton Hills, and the level of constraints that it faces, and the vast range of application documents that would be required, including Environmental Assessment, it is realistic to assume that an outline application could take 9-12 months to be determined. Given the level of information that would be required to support the application (Consultant Reports, EA, Public/Statutory Consultation), therefore, it is realistic and reasonable to assume that it may take upto two years, from adoption of the plan in 2020, for an outline planning application to be granted planning permission.
2.16 There would then, of course, follow further applications to discharge conditions and Reserved Matters applications, none of which would be straight forward and would require similar levels of detail to an Outline Planning Application. This process could, itself, take 9-12 months, if not longer.
2.17 Accordingly, it is realistic to assume that, from adoption, it would take close to three years before planning permissions have been approved, and conditions discharged, such that development can commence on site. This would mean that, at the earliest, dwellings will not be brought forward until 2023/24, and not 2022/23 as considered by the Housing Trajectory. Such delays in the Council's Housing Trajectory will have inevitable consequences on the Local Authority being able to deliver its housing requirement during the Plan Period.
2.18 As such, it is considered that additional sites will be required during the Plan Period to ensure that a) the Local Authority is able to deliver its housing requirement during the Plan Period (notwithstanding our view that the Council has not calculated its correct requirement); and b) that additional sites will be required to allow for flexibility in allocated sites not being brought forward within the timescales identified within the Housing Trajectory.
2.19 Furthermore, it is considered that the Local Plan is not sound as it does not comply with paragraph 68 of the NPPF.
2.20 Paragraph 59 of the NPPF requires Local Authorities to 'boost significantly' the supply of housing and must, "ensure choice and competition in the market for land". This involves boosting provision of housing from a variety of sources, including small sites which are suitable for smaller housebuilders.
2.21 This is reinforced by paragraph 68 of the revised NPPF, which confirms that small sites make an important contribution to meeting housing requirements and confirms that planning authorities should accommodate at least 10% of their housing requirement on sites no larger than one hectare.
2.22 The Council's housing strategy only allocates 5% on sites no larger than one hectare. The NPPF confirms that smaller sites make an important contribution to meeting housing requirement, in part as they are able to be developed quickly and are able to therefore contribute towards housing supply whilst Strategic Sites are being brought forward in the background.
2.23 Accordingly, it is considered that, as identified above with the Dunton Hills Strategic Allocation, that a greater percentage of smaller sites (such as land at 41 Shenfield Road) should be identified for allocation.
2.24 We would therefore request that the Local Authority reviews its housing supply, and particularly its approach to small sites, and allocate suitable smaller sites which can be brought forward early in the plan period.
2.25 With regards to the Council's approach to housing allocations and its housing trajectory, therefore, it is not considered that the Brentwood Local Plan - Pre-Submission Document can be considered to be sound as, in accordance with paragraph 35 of the NPPF, the Local Plan has not been positively prepared (as it is unlikely that the strategy will ensure that, as a minimum, the plan will meet the Council's Objectively Assessed Need), and is not consistent with national policy in its approach to allocated development on smaller sites.
3. Question 6
Question 6: Please set out what modification(s) you consider necessary to make the Local Plan sound or legally compliant, having regard to the matters that you identified above.
STRATEGIC POLICY SP02: Managing Growth
3.1 With regards to Section 2, it is considered that Brentwood Borough Council will need to revisit its evidence base to determine a housing requirement which uses the 2014 population projections as a starting point. This will result in a larger housing requirement, with our estimate based on the indicative Standard Method being approximately 545 homes per year, or a total of 9,262 homes during the plan period 2016-2033.
Chapter 9 - Site Allocations & Local Development Plan Housing Trajectory
3.2 It is considered that additional sites should be allocated to ensure that the Local Authority can meet its housing requirement to 2033. Even if the Inspector agree with the Council's objectively assessed need, it is likely that additional sites will be required to be brought forward given the Council's overly optimistic approach to its housing trajectory, particularly with regards to Dunton Hills Garden Village.
3.3 Furthermore, the Local Plan does not allocate a sufficient number of 'small sites' to contribute towards the housing requirement, as per paragraph 68 of the NPPF.
3.4 It is considered that land at 41 Shenfield Road is an appropriate site for residential development and should be allocated for between 21-46 dwellings.
3.5 The site includes 41 Shenfield Road, which is sited within the residential area and outside of the Green Belt, and land to the north of the swelling, which lies within the Green Belt. This part of the site is bordered to the south and east by residential development on Shenfield Road and Glanmead.
3.6 There can be no dispute that the site lies within a sustainable location, lying within walking distance of Brentwood Town Centre, Brentwood Rail Station, Brentwood Community Hospital and Brentwood School. The site is therefore a suitable site for residential development, other than for the fact that it lies with the Green Belt and is therefore, technically within the Countryside (albeit bordered on two boundaries by residential development, and entirely enclosed by mature landscaping and woodland on other boundaries).
3.7 Brentwood Borough Council published parts 1 & 2 of its Green Belt study in January 2018. These initial parts showed 41 Shenfield Road lying on the southern edge of 'Parcel 42 Northwest of Shenfield'. The report when assessing the parcel as a whole, confirms that it abuts the large built up area, and that development within this parcel would be seen as an 'urban extension'.
3.8 The Green Belt Study Part 3 - "Assessment of Potential Housing, Employment and Mixed Use Sites in the Green Belt and their Relative Contribution to the Purposes of the Green Belt Designation" - was published in November 2018, and subsequently amended in January 2019. This part of the Green Belt Study assesses the potential Site Allocations against the purposes of the Green Belt.
3.9 41 Shenfield Road is included within Part 3 as site reference 320, with the report considering that the site makes a 'moderate' contribution towards the Green Belt. The report confirms that the site is a relatively small site, contained by woodland cover and adjacent to Shenfield.
3.10 Our own assessment against the purposes of the Green Belt is given below.
* Purpose 1: to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas The site lies within the urban area of Brentwood, a short distance from the town centre. The site is well constrained by existing built development and mature trees and woodland. Development would be seen as a small infill development and would have a very limited encroachment into the countryside. Existing site boundaries would prevent any further development into the Green Belt, with these boundaries presenting a strong and definite boundary to further development. * Purpose 2: to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another Development on this site would not significantly reduce the countryside gap between Shenfield and Brentwood. The countryside separation between Shenfield and Brentwood would be retained. * Purpose 3: to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment The site has no specific countryside function, being seen as residential gardens within the context of an Urban Settlement. * Purpose 4: to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns The site has a limited relationship with the historic town of Brentwood.
3.11 Accordingly, it is considered that the site is suitable to be released from the Green Belt.
3.12 Furthermore, it is noted that the Borough Council's proposed allocations allocates a number of sites within the Green Belt which the Green Belt Study confirms as making a 'moderate' contribution to the Green Belt, similar to 41 Shenfield Road, including:
* Site R23 Brizes Corner Field, Kelvedon Hatch (23 dwellings);
* Site R25 Land north of Woolard Way, Blackmore (40 dwellings); and
* Site R26 Land north of Orchard Piece, Blackmore (30 dwellings).
3.13 The spatial strategy shown within the plan as 'Figure 5' confirms that the site lies within a 'Main Town'. Land at 41 Shenfield Road is therefore more sequentially preferable for development than a number of Preferred Site Allocations, such as those within the villages of Ingatestone, Kelvedon Hatch and West Thorndon, and to those identified at paragraph 3.12 of this representation.
3.14 Furthermore, paragraph 3.23 of the Pre-Submission Local Plan confirms that Brentwood will deliver development in terms of a sequential land use test, with land within Urban Areas preferred to all other land. There can be no doubt that land at 41 Shenfield Road lies within the urban area of Brentwood.
.15 Those sites listed at paragraph 3.12 of this representation are located within villages and the
rural area which can offer, as a result of their location, far fewer services and facilities than land at 41 Shenfield Road. These sites, especially, are less sequentially preferable than the site at 41 Shenfield Road.
3.16 Accordingly, we would request that the Local Plan be modified to allocate Land at 41 Shenfield Road for residential development, for 24 dwellings, in accordance with Policy HP03 of the Pre- Submission Local Plan which confirms that residential development proposals will generally be expected to achieve a net density of at least 35 dwellings per hectare or higher. Given the sites location within such a sustainable location, it is considered that 35dph on the site is appropriate and would accord with paragraph 123 of the NPPF which confirms that planning policies should avoid homes being built at low densities, and to ensure that development make optimal use of the potential of each site.
4. Question 8
If you wish to participate at the oral part of the Examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary.
4.1 RS2 Properties Ltd would welcome the opportunity to present oral evidence to the Inspector, if required, in order to provide further detail in respect of the proposed allocation and to provide further evidence in respect of application timescales and the deliverability of development on this site.
4.2 We would therefore like to participate in the examination process.
5. Summary & Conclusions
5.1 RS2 Properties Ltd is presenting the Council and Local Plan Inspector with a site that is capable of delivering 24 dwellings, within a sustainable location. The site is suitable, available, achievable within five years, is in a highly sustainable location and performs a similar contribution to Green Belt purposes to many of the proposed site allocation within the Pre- Submission Plan. The site is sequentially preferable to these sites, given its location within the Urban Area and its location, therefore, to many shops and services and accessibility to public transport.
5.2 The site and its promoter meet the Governments aspirations and direction of travel in policy in terms of supporting the delivery of much needed small and medium sites to boost significantly the supply of housing and provide choice and competition as required by the NPPF, and which has been reinforced by the revised NPPF.
5.3 It is considered that additional smaller sites need to be allocated to allow for flexibility in the Council's housing supply; and that the Council's OAN may need to be reconsidered in light of the proposed Standard Method for calculating housing supply.
5.4 We therefore urge the Local Authority and Local Plan Inspector to recognise the Governments strategy and allocate the land at 41 Shenfield Road, Brentwood, Essex, CM15 8EN for delivery of 24 dwellings in the first five years of the Plan period.
5.5 Please record this representation as a formal submission towards the Local Plan evidence base and drafting stages and we look forward to the opportunity to presenting evidence to the Local Plan Inspector and answering any questions that the Inspector may have with regards to residential development on this site.

The Local Plan should allocate Land at 41 Shenfield Road for 24 dwellings.

1. Introduction
1.1 This representation has been is made towards the Brentwood Local Plan Pre-Submission Regulation 19 consultation document, on behalf of our client, RS2 Properties Ltd, who is seeking to promote land at 41 Shenfield Road through the Local Plan process for residential development. A site location plan is attached as Appendix 1.
1.2 The site comprises the dwelling at No.41 Shenfield Road, which is sited within the residential area and outside the Green Belt. Land to the south of the dwelling lies within the Green Belt, albeit abutting the residential area on its southern, western and eastern boundaries.
1.3 Shenfield Road is the main road which links the centre of Brentwood with the A12, which runs through Essex into London. The site lies within a clearly sustainable location, lying 600m from the town centre; 1200m from the train station; adjacent to the Brentwood Sports Ground and Cricket Club; 1200m from primary schools and sports pitches on Sawyers Hall Lane; 300m from Brentwood Community Hospital; and 400m from Brentwood School.
1.4 In all respects, the site lies within a sustainable location and development on this site would comply with the Government's core planning principle to focus development in locations which are sustainable.
1.5 A development on this site of between 30-65 dwellings per hectare (as Policy H14 of the existing Local Plan would require) could result in a scheme of between 21-46 dwellings. RS2 Properties Ltd have not identified any site-specific constraints which would preclude development on this site coming forward and would bring forward development on this site within five years.
1.6 This representation follows the submission of the site, during the 'Call for Sites' in November 2017, as a site suitable for residential development, and representations made in March 2018 in respect of the Preferred Site Allocations (Regulation 18). A copy of these earlier representations are provided as Appendix 2.
1.7 These representations have adopted the format of the Local Plan comments form and are based around answering the following questions:
* Question 5: Please provide details of either:
Why you consider the Plan to be sound, legally compliant, or adheres to the Duty to Cooperate; or
Why you consider that the Local Plan is unsound, is not legally compliant, or fails to comply with the Duty to Cooperate;
* Question 6: Please set out what modification(s) you consider necessary to make the Local Plan sound or legally compliant, having regard to the matters that you identified above; and
* Question 8: If you wish to participate at the oral part of the Examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary.
2. Question 5
Please provide details of either: Why you consider the Plan to be sound, legally compliant, or adheres to the Duty to Cooperate; or
Why you consider that the Local Plan is unsound, is not legally compliant, or fails to comply with the Duty to Cooperate.
STRATEGIC POLICY SP02: Managing Growth
2.1 It is not considered that the Local Plan is sound, as the Council's Housing Requirement is not considered to have been calculated correctly.
2.2 The Planning Practice Guidance section on 'Housing and economic needs assessment', which was updated on 20 February 2019, confirms at 'Paragraph: 005 Reference ID: 2a-005- 20190220' that 2014 based household projections should be used as the baseline for the 'standard method'. The reason given for this approach is to provide stability for planning authorities and communities, ensure that historic under-delivery and declining affordability are reflected, and to be consistent with the Government's objective of significantly boosting the supply of homes.
2.3 Paragraph 4.13 of the Local Plan confirms that Council's 'housing requirement figure' to be 350 dwellings per year. With a 20% uplift, the total annual housing requirement is 456 dwellings per year.
2.4 This housing requirement has been calculated within the Strategic Housing Market Assessment, published in October 2018 (i.e. before the latest Planning Practice Guidance assessment). This Assessment confirms that the housing requirement has been calculated using the 2016 population projections as a starting point (see paragraph 8.26 of the SHMA in particular). Accordingly, the Plan cannot be considered to be sound on this basis.
2.5 An indicative assessment of housing need based on the Standard Method using the 2014 population projections was published in September 2017. This stated that Brentwood's housing need, based on the Standard Method, was 454 dwellings per annum. Applying the 20% uplift to this figure would result in a housing requirement of 545 homes per year, or a total of 9,262 homes during the plan period 2016-2033.
2.6 This is an increase of 1,510 dwellings from the housing requirement calculated by the SHMA calculations which uses the 2016 population projections as a starting point.
2.7 Accordingly, we consider that the Inspector should, during the Examination, request that Brentwood update its evidence base, and its housing requirement, to reflect the 2014 based population projections. This will result in the requirement to identify additional site allocations, as considered further below.
2.8 With regards to Strategic Policy SP02, therefore, it is not considered that the Brentwood Local Plan - Pre-Submission Document can be considered to be sound as, in accordance with paragraph 35 of the NPPF, the Plan has not consistent with National Policy in its use of 2016 population projections to determine its housing requirement. In this respect, the plan has also not been positively prepared as it will not, as a minimum, meet its objectively assessed needs.
Chapter 9 - Site Allocations & Local Development Plan Housing Trajectory
2.9 The sites that the Borough Council have identified for residential development are detailed at Chapter 9 of the Local Plan. Table 4.2 of the Local Plan identifies that the allocations total 6,088 dwellings, with the remaining dwellings comprising completions between 2016/17 & 2017/18 (363 dwellings); extant permissions (926 dwellings); and the windfall allowance between 2023-2033 (410 dwellings).
2.10 Accordingly, should the Inspector agree with our assessment that Brentwood's housing requirement is not sound, and the housing requirement thus increases, it would therefore be necessary to identify additional sites for allocation.
2.11 The following section of this Representation provides support for land at 41 Shenfield Road, Brentwood, to be allocated for residential development.
2.12 Notwithstanding this, it is considered that additional sites will be required in any event to ensure the housing requirement is met. Appendix 1 of the Local Plan sets out the Council's anticipated Housing Trajectory, which we do not agree with. The Council's calculations of when sites will be delivered, and how many dwellings will be delivered each year, appears overly ambitious.
2.13 In particular, Dunton Hills Garden Village is identified as being capable of delivering 2,700 dwellings during the plan period, with the site being capable of delivering 100 dwellings starting from 2022/23 (i.e. within 3 years), and then between 150 - 300 dwellings each year thereafter.
2.14 This level of growth from such a strategic allocation does not appear realistic. For example, it is unlikely that the Local Plan will be adopted until 2020 at the earliest (the Council's Local Development Scheme suggests that the plan would be adopted in Q3 2019, but the timescales have slipped as the Plan was due to have been submitted in Q1 2019).
2.15 For a scheme of Dunton Hills, and the level of constraints that it faces, and the vast range of application documents that would be required, including Environmental Assessment, it is realistic to assume that an outline application could take 9-12 months to be determined. Given the level of information that would be required to support the application (Consultant Reports, EA, Public/Statutory Consultation), therefore, it is realistic and reasonable to assume that it may take upto two years, from adoption of the plan in 2020, for an outline planning application to be granted planning permission.
2.16 There would then, of course, follow further applications to discharge conditions and Reserved Matters applications, none of which would be straight forward and would require similar levels of detail to an Outline Planning Application. This process could, itself, take 9-12 months, if not longer.
2.17 Accordingly, it is realistic to assume that, from adoption, it would take close to three years before planning permissions have been approved, and conditions discharged, such that development can commence on site. This would mean that, at the earliest, dwellings will not be brought forward until 2023/24, and not 2022/23 as considered by the Housing Trajectory. Such delays in the Council's Housing Trajectory will have inevitable consequences on the Local Authority being able to deliver its housing requirement during the Plan Period.
2.18 As such, it is considered that additional sites will be required during the Plan Period to ensure that a) the Local Authority is able to deliver its housing requirement during the Plan Period (notwithstanding our view that the Council has not calculated its correct requirement); and b) that additional sites will be required to allow for flexibility in allocated sites not being brought forward within the timescales identified within the Housing Trajectory.
2.19 Furthermore, it is considered that the Local Plan is not sound as it does not comply with paragraph 68 of the NPPF.
2.20 Paragraph 59 of the NPPF requires Local Authorities to 'boost significantly' the supply of housing and must, "ensure choice and competition in the market for land". This involves boosting provision of housing from a variety of sources, including small sites which are suitable for smaller housebuilders.
2.21 This is reinforced by paragraph 68 of the revised NPPF, which confirms that small sites make an important contribution to meeting housing requirements and confirms that planning authorities should accommodate at least 10% of their housing requirement on sites no larger than one hectare.
2.22 The Council's housing strategy only allocates 5% on sites no larger than one hectare. The NPPF confirms that smaller sites make an important contribution to meeting housing requirement, in part as they are able to be developed quickly and are able to therefore contribute towards housing supply whilst Strategic Sites are being brought forward in the background.
2.23 Accordingly, it is considered that, as identified above with the Dunton Hills Strategic Allocation, that a greater percentage of smaller sites (such as land at 41 Shenfield Road) should be identified for allocation.
2.24 We would therefore request that the Local Authority reviews its housing supply, and particularly its approach to small sites, and allocate suitable smaller sites which can be brought forward early in the plan period.
2.25 With regards to the Council's approach to housing allocations and its housing trajectory, therefore, it is not considered that the Brentwood Local Plan - Pre-Submission Document can be considered to be sound as, in accordance with paragraph 35 of the NPPF, the Local Plan has not been positively prepared (as it is unlikely that the strategy will ensure that, as a minimum, the plan will meet the Council's Objectively Assessed Need), and is not consistent with national policy in its approach to allocated development on smaller sites.
3. Question 6
Question 6: Please set out what modification(s) you consider necessary to make the Local Plan sound or legally compliant, having regard to the matters that you identified above.
STRATEGIC POLICY SP02: Managing Growth
3.1 With regards to Section 2, it is considered that Brentwood Borough Council will need to revisit its evidence base to determine a housing requirement which uses the 2014 population projections as a starting point. This will result in a larger housing requirement, with our estimate based on the indicative Standard Method being approximately 545 homes per year, or a total of 9,262 homes during the plan period 2016-2033.
Chapter 9 - Site Allocations & Local Development Plan Housing Trajectory
3.2 It is considered that additional sites should be allocated to ensure that the Local Authority can meet its housing requirement to 2033. Even if the Inspector agree with the Council's objectively assessed need, it is likely that additional sites will be required to be brought forward given the Council's overly optimistic approach to its housing trajectory, particularly with regards to Dunton Hills Garden Village.
3.3 Furthermore, the Local Plan does not allocate a sufficient number of 'small sites' to contribute towards the housing requirement, as per paragraph 68 of the NPPF.
3.4 It is considered that land at 41 Shenfield Road is an appropriate site for residential development and should be allocated for between 21-46 dwellings.
3.5 The site includes 41 Shenfield Road, which is sited within the residential area and outside of the Green Belt, and land to the north of the swelling, which lies within the Green Belt. This part of the site is bordered to the south and east by residential development on Shenfield Road and Glanmead.
3.6 There can be no dispute that the site lies within a sustainable location, lying within walking distance of Brentwood Town Centre, Brentwood Rail Station, Brentwood Community Hospital and Brentwood School. The site is therefore a suitable site for residential development, other than for the fact that it lies with the Green Belt and is therefore, technically within the Countryside (albeit bordered on two boundaries by residential development, and entirely enclosed by mature landscaping and woodland on other boundaries).
3.7 Brentwood Borough Council published parts 1 & 2 of its Green Belt study in January 2018. These initial parts showed 41 Shenfield Road lying on the southern edge of 'Parcel 42 Northwest of Shenfield'. The report when assessing the parcel as a whole, confirms that it abuts the large built up area, and that development within this parcel would be seen as an 'urban extension'.
3.8 The Green Belt Study Part 3 - "Assessment of Potential Housing, Employment and Mixed Use Sites in the Green Belt and their Relative Contribution to the Purposes of the Green Belt Designation" - was published in November 2018, and subsequently amended in January 2019. This part of the Green Belt Study assesses the potential Site Allocations against the purposes of the Green Belt.
3.9 41 Shenfield Road is included within Part 3 as site reference 320, with the report considering that the site makes a 'moderate' contribution towards the Green Belt. The report confirms that the site is a relatively small site, contained by woodland cover and adjacent to Shenfield.
3.10 Our own assessment against the purposes of the Green Belt is given below.
* Purpose 1: to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas The site lies within the urban area of Brentwood, a short distance from the town centre. The site is well constrained by existing built development and mature trees and woodland. Development would be seen as a small infill development and would have a very limited encroachment into the countryside. Existing site boundaries would prevent any further development into the Green Belt, with these boundaries presenting a strong and definite boundary to further development. * Purpose 2: to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another Development on this site would not significantly reduce the countryside gap between Shenfield and Brentwood. The countryside separation between Shenfield and Brentwood would be retained. * Purpose 3: to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment The site has no specific countryside function, being seen as residential gardens within the context of an Urban Settlement. * Purpose 4: to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns The site has a limited relationship with the historic town of Brentwood.
3.11 Accordingly, it is considered that the site is suitable to be released from the Green Belt.
3.12 Furthermore, it is noted that the Borough Council's proposed allocations allocates a number of sites within the Green Belt which the Green Belt Study confirms as making a 'moderate' contribution to the Green Belt, similar to 41 Shenfield Road, including:
* Site R23 Brizes Corner Field, Kelvedon Hatch (23 dwellings);
* Site R25 Land north of Woolard Way, Blackmore (40 dwellings); and
* Site R26 Land north of Orchard Piece, Blackmore (30 dwellings).
3.13 The spatial strategy shown within the plan as 'Figure 5' confirms that the site lies within a 'Main Town'. Land at 41 Shenfield Road is therefore more sequentially preferable for development than a number of Preferred Site Allocations, such as those within the villages of Ingatestone, Kelvedon Hatch and West Thorndon, and to those identified at paragraph 3.12 of this representation.
3.14 Furthermore, paragraph 3.23 of the Pre-Submission Local Plan confirms that Brentwood will deliver development in terms of a sequential land use test, with land within Urban Areas preferred to all other land. There can be no doubt that land at 41 Shenfield Road lies within the urban area of Brentwood.
.15 Those sites listed at paragraph 3.12 of this representation are located within villages and the
rural area which can offer, as a result of their location, far fewer services and facilities than land at 41 Shenfield Road. These sites, especially, are less sequentially preferable than the site at 41 Shenfield Road.
3.16 Accordingly, we would request that the Local Plan be modified to allocate Land at 41 Shenfield Road for residential development, for 24 dwellings, in accordance with Policy HP03 of the Pre- Submission Local Plan which confirms that residential development proposals will generally be expected to achieve a net density of at least 35 dwellings per hectare or higher. Given the sites location within such a sustainable location, it is considered that 35dph on the site is appropriate and would accord with paragraph 123 of the NPPF which confirms that planning policies should avoid homes being built at low densities, and to ensure that development make optimal use of the potential of each site.
4. Question 8
If you wish to participate at the oral part of the Examination, please outline why you consider this to be necessary.
4.1 RS2 Properties Ltd would welcome the opportunity to present oral evidence to the Inspector, if required, in order to provide further detail in respect of the proposed allocation and to provide further evidence in respect of application timescales and the deliverability of development on this site.
4.2 We would therefore like to participate in the examination process.
5. Summary & Conclusions
5.1 RS2 Properties Ltd is presenting the Council and Local Plan Inspector with a site that is capable of delivering 24 dwellings, within a sustainable location. The site is suitable, available, achievable within five years, is in a highly sustainable location and performs a similar contribution to Green Belt purposes to many of the proposed site allocation within the Pre- Submission Plan. The site is sequentially preferable to these sites, given its location within the Urban Area and its location, therefore, to many shops and services and accessibility to public transport.
5.2 The site and its promoter meet the Governments aspirations and direction of travel in policy in terms of supporting the delivery of much needed small and medium sites to boost significantly the supply of housing and provide choice and competition as required by the NPPF, and which has been reinforced by the revised NPPF.
5.3 It is considered that additional smaller sites need to be allocated to allow for flexibility in the Council's housing supply; and that the Council's OAN may need to be reconsidered in light of the proposed Standard Method for calculating housing supply.
5.4 We therefore urge the Local Authority and Local Plan Inspector to recognise the Governments strategy and allocate the land at 41 Shenfield Road, Brentwood, Essex, CM15 8EN for delivery of 24 dwellings in the first five years of the Plan period.
5.5 Please record this representation as a formal submission towards the Local Plan evidence base and drafting stages and we look forward to the opportunity to presenting evidence to the Local Plan Inspector and answering any questions that the Inspector may have with regards to residential development on this site.