Object

Representation ID: 29895

Received: 26/11/2021

Respondent: Philip Cunliffe-Jones

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

The first criterion in revised Policy HP05-Paragraph D introduced by MM39 is too absolute. It is always possible for dwellings to be acquired by a Registered Social Provider, including the Council , but it may not be practicable for providers to manage especially in the case of a small number and the financial negotiations can also lead to an impasse.

Object

Representation ID: 30066

Received: 29/11/2021

Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Limited

Agent: Lichfields

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Supports replacing SHMA reference with “housing evidence”. However, the policy needs to be more flexible for larger strategic sites which have specific challenges associated with delivering homes across multiple phases over the plan period. The current wording applies the tenure split too rigidly. For these developments, the policy needs to consider when infrastructure is delivered, viability, and the overall tenure split for the site as each plot comes forward. DHGV will be delivered up-to and post 2033. Hence there is a need to consider and account for potential for changes to the housing needs over such a long period.