3.60
Comment
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 29
Received: 11/08/2013
Respondent: Mrs Ann Cardus
The park and stride location is too far from the station.
The park and stride location is too far from the station
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 51
Received: 27/08/2013
Respondent: Ms Alison Garrett
The proposal is flawed as it does not represent the facts in terms of land availability or estimated walking times for commuters. The consultation should be re-launched with a level of information that allows thinking and consideration.
A very unprofessional approach to a consultation that in affect restricts comment from local residents.
I object to the proposal as the council have failed to provide adequate and accurate information for the purpose of consultation. 1. the map fails to provide scale or detail. 2 the estimated 10 minute walk is almost certainly grossly underestimating the walk time for passengers.
I am shocked that the council have failed to provide a professional / transparent approach to the information within this consultation. I failing to do so they have wasted an opportunity to effectively communicate with Brentwood residents. The consultation should be re-launched to share real and meaningful information based on the map OS map references and realistic aspirations for this proposal.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 68
Received: 09/09/2013
Respondent: Mr Stephen Priddle
The Shenfield Park & Walk for Crossrail must not have more people walking along Alexander Lane (Fig 3.4). The pavement is too narrow and is already crowded with school children and commuters. Alternatives would include going direct via Hunter Ave (also quicker)&/or put traffic calming into Alexander Lane.
The Shenfield Park & Walk for Crossrail must not have more people walking along Alexander Lane (Fig 3.4). The pavement is too narrow and is already crowded with school children and commuters. Direct via Hunter Ave (also quicker)&/or put traffic calming into AL.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 844
Received: 27/08/2013
Respondent: Miss Jacqueline Liesa Walker
I am objecting to the proposed plan regarding the Shenfield Park & Walk, the lane is unlit no path way it will a case of tribs of people noise evening & morning rubbish dropped parking the land next to Alexander House, which is for traffic turning.
- this is a peaceful quite area and this will disrupt all that car's speed down the lane as it is. So there will extra volume of traffic diceing with death when we need to cross the road.
I am objecting to the proposed plan regarding the Shenfield Park & Walk, the lane is unlit no path way it will a case of tribs of people noise evening & morning rubbish dropped parking the land next to Alexander House, which is for traffic turning. With door banging, this is a peaceful quite area and this will disrupt all that car's speed down the lane as it is. So there will extra volume of traffic diceing with death when we need to cross the road. As well as it all a nuisance. Plus the piece of land ground next to where I live car's have been parking 24hr rather than go to a pay c.park I had to go at side at 3.30am in the morning with an owner banging and slamming every door, notes have been put the car's to stop it also a few weeks ago a motor cyclist was thrown from his bike and the ambulance and paramedic had to park on the road as 2 cars to turn round and emergency services a council notice needs to be put up to stop car's using it as a carp park, leaving litter etc
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 852
Received: 27/08/2013
Respondent: Mr Jeremiah Port
As you can see from the sketch I am living in the corner of Alexander Lane and the railway, with fields at the back and side. So I would not like a car park at the back or on the side of my property. There will also be increased traffic both vehicles and pedestrian in Alexander Lane so on the present plan I object.
As you can see from the sketch I am living in the corner of Alexander Lane and the railway, with fields at the back and side. So I would not like a car park at the back or on the side of my property. There will also be increased traffic both vehicles and pedestrian in Alexander Lane so on the present plan I object.
Comment
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 873
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Network Rail
Regarding Shenfield Station, there will be plans available shortly to improve the car parking facility. This may conflict with Para 3.60 regarding intention to provide a park & walk facility and potentially redevelop exisitng car parks. It is not clear if the current car park operated by Greater Anglia is included in this vision. As a result reference to other surrounding car parks excluding the current railway car park is advisable to ensure policy is not implemented preventing the proposed improvements to the current car park serving the station.
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1128
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mr. Michael Keogh
I do not support the proposed 'Park and Walk' concept, in particular the proposed location for the following reasons:
- It would result in the loss of Green Belt land for use not supported in the NPPF and is contrary to the general approach set out by the borough.
- Consideration is being given to the redevelopment of existing car park around Shenfield if this policy is enacted. The loss of these sites would lead to loss in Green Belt sites in the area.
- I do not consider Alexander Lane to be a suitable location for parking.
see attached letter