9.116

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 22217

Received: 05/03/2019

Respondent: Mr Robin Ibrahim

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

With flawed and missing evidence, in particular transport impact, more education and health infrastructure is needed, site location unsuitable.

Change suggested by respondent:

Please see previous comments on above page

Full text:

The evidence base is flawed:
The transport Assessment is inaccurate as it has excluded traffic along Priests Lane, and was taken at times which excluded a large proportion of school traffic, despite Council assurances that a traffic assessment would be done for Priests Lane.
The Transport Assessment does not account for the increased usage of Priests Lane from the proposed development of 1000 houses in Shenfield travelling to the A127, nor does it account for the impact of the Elizabeth Line.
The Plan fails to address safety of residents : the technical submissions residents that new road accesses along Priests Lane are hazardous have not been addressed, nor concerns that the road design is dangerous for increased traffic movements.
The site does not meet relevant sustainability conditions, notably access, transport network, mitigation of impact on local services, and unacceptable effect on health due to increased pollution.
The Priests Lane sites have been rejected previously because the land was deemed a valuable open urban space.
No account has been made of the increased pollution along Middleton Hall Lane and Priests Lane, the junction of which is a pollution hotspot.
The Lane was never meant to be a main distributary road which it has now become. Residents have pointed out that as such it does not comply with the Essex Design Guide with respect to road and pavement width.
Local Plans should address not only housing but traffic concerns, health care and education needs.
The sustainability review refers to traffic as a concern, but no mitigation options have been identified.
No specific or robust argument has been made that a viable access point is possible.
When considered against reasonable alternatives these sites cannot be deemed justified and there is nowhere in the plan which allows for the enhancement of infrastructure as a result of development.
There is no additional provision for increased educational and health needs, the expansion of Hogarth School is to meet current demands and there is already a low level of GPs per head. Schools further afield which may have space will require a car journey to attend, exacerbating the already dire traffic situation.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 22454

Received: 19/03/2019

Respondent: Essex County Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

2. Justified.
3. Effective.
4. Consistent with National Policy.

Request replacement of paragraph 9.116 to ensure factual representation of the current position in respect of flooding, in line with paragraphs 155 and 156 of the NPPF.

Change suggested by respondent:

Replace paragraph 9.116 with the following wording:

The site falls partially within the Brentwood CDA. Any development within this area should where possible try to have a positive impact on existing areas of flood risk downstream of the development. It should be ensured that any development within this area complies with flood risk mitigation measures outlined in the Essex SuDS guide.

Full text:

2. Justified.
3. Effective.
4. Consistent with National Policy.

Request replacement of paragraph 9.116 to ensure factual representation of the current position in respect of flooding, in line with paragraphs 155 and 156 of the NPPF.