9.10
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 22204
Received: 04/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Christopher Garside
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
At 06:30 in the morning the A127 is crawling with traffic London bound. The link roads to the A13 are insufficient to carry traffic via that route. Trains through West Horndon are already full at 07:00 in the morning. No additions to infrastructure are stated in the plan.
Put the infrastructure in first.
At 06:30 in the morning the A127 is crawling with traffic London bound. The link roads to the A13 are insufficient to carry traffic via that route. Trains through West Horndon are already full at 07:00 in the morning. No additions to infrastructure are stated in the plan.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 22334
Received: 17/03/2019
Respondent: Miss Caroline May
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
I object to this statement as Dunton Hills Garden Village site is not sustainable due to the size of the development. This is not sustainable due to the proposal being in a high flood risk area with no proper plan in place to mitigate against future flooding. It is also not sustainable in terms of infrastructure. The road network can not cope with current levels of traffic, let alone a development of this size. How this could reasonably be accommodated has not been evaluated. The rail network again can not cope with this size of development area. Generally the environmental impact is huge.
The proposed development on this site the is simply too large. It is trying to focus significant build all in one area where it it not feasible to do so for some very practical reasons.
I object to this statement as the site is not sustainable due to the size of the development. This is not sustainable due to the proposal being in a high flood risk area with no proper plan in place to mitigate against future flooding. It is also not sustainable in terms of infrastructure. The road network can not cope with current levels of traffic, let alone a development of this size. How this could reasonably be accommodated has not been evaluated. The rail network again can not cope with this size of development area. Generally the environmental impact is huge.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 22584
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Sasha Millwood
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
I do not want any reduction in Green Belt Boundaries ever. Not now, not in the next Plan period. According to the NPPF, the Green Belt is supposed to be "permanent". Making such a massive reduction would set a precedent for the Green Belt being regarded as a "managed reduction in green space" rather than a "permanent" amenity.
Previous consultations have shown an overwhelming majority against any development of this sort.
Eliminate proposal for Dunton Hills Garden Village.
I do not want any reduction in Green Belt Boundaries ever. Not now, not in the next Plan period. According to the NPPF, the Green Belt is supposed to be "permanent". Making such a massive reduction would set a precedent for the Green Belt being regarded as a "managed reduction in green space" rather than a "permanent" amenity.
Previous consultations have shown an overwhelming majority against any development of this sort.