Green Belt and Rural Development
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26291
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Neil Warner
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
I understand that there has been no housing needs survey to demonstrate why Blackmore is included in the LDP. There should be clear evidence that all brownfield sites in the Borough have been fully utilised in an development plan. There is insufficient local infrastructure to cope with the planned housing expansion.
Site R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP. Please refer to the BVHA Neighbourhood Plan which sets out local housing need.
I understand that there has been no housing needs survey to demonstrate why Blackmore is included in the LDP. There should be clear evidence that all brownfield sites in the Borough have been fully utilised in an development plan. There is insufficient local infrastructure to cope with the planned housing expansion.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26295
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs. Gillian Warner
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Brownfield sites in the Borough as a whole should be developed before ever considering green field and green belt sites.
Sites R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP. Please refer to the BVHA Neighbourhood Plan which sets out local housing need
I consider the Local Plan in relation to development at Blackmore is unsound for the following principal reasons: - 1. Brownfield sites in the Borough as a whole should be developed before ever considering green field and green belt sites. 2. I understand there has been no "housing needs survey" to demonstrate that Blackmore should be in the LDP. 3. The infrastructure in and around the village is already exhausted. Blackmore cannot take more housing without extensive changes to the infrastructure.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26352
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Arthur Birch
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Blackmore has only modest facilities and would struggle to accommodate these developments
There does appear to be any clear coherent idea for the villages including Blackmore. No cohesion with neighbouring authorities. Other private developments, i.e. Fingrith Hall Lane and Red Rose Lane etc don't appear to have been taken into consideration. Blackmore has only modest facilities and would struggle to accommodate these developments. Locally traffic seems to be mushroomed. Parking in the village centre is difficult. I think there are other allocated sites which could accommodate these developments more easily.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26445
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Wendy Dunbar
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Site is greenbelt and should remain as such. BBC should develop all brownfield sites first before considering greenbelt development.
Site R25 and R26 to be removed from the LDP and Planners to refer to the BVHA neighbourhood plan which details the local housing needs, etc.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26458
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr John Orbell
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Green belt should be protected. Build on brownfield sites first.
Sites R25 and R26 be removed from the LDP Plan. You need to refer to he Blackmore Village Heritage Association for our Local Housing Needs for our sustainable community. We do not want unwanted and unjustified large scale development. There has been no 'Housing Needs Survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore is included in the LDP. Was is not the Brentwood Borough Council who said "we will continue to protect our key assets including the environment, heritage and character of the borough".
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26462
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Karen York
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Green belt should be protect.
Please refer to the plan put together by BVHA
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26491
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Surinder Panesar
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
infrastructure is not strong enough to manage the proposed growth and there is a disproportionate allocation to Blackmore.
Site R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP and planners should refer to the BVHA neighbourhood Plan which clearly sets out the local housing needs, for our already sustainable community.
See attached.