Green Belt and Rural Development

Showing comments and forms 31 to 37 of 37

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 26291

Received: 12/03/2019

Respondent: Mr Neil Warner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

I understand that there has been no housing needs survey to demonstrate why Blackmore is included in the LDP. There should be clear evidence that all brownfield sites in the Borough have been fully utilised in an development plan. There is insufficient local infrastructure to cope with the planned housing expansion.

Change suggested by respondent:

Site R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP. Please refer to the BVHA Neighbourhood Plan which sets out local housing need.

Full text:

I understand that there has been no housing needs survey to demonstrate why Blackmore is included in the LDP. There should be clear evidence that all brownfield sites in the Borough have been fully utilised in an development plan. There is insufficient local infrastructure to cope with the planned housing expansion.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 26295

Received: 12/03/2019

Respondent: Mrs. Gillian Warner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Brownfield sites in the Borough as a whole should be developed before ever considering green field and green belt sites.

Change suggested by respondent:

Sites R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP. Please refer to the BVHA Neighbourhood Plan which sets out local housing need

Full text:

I consider the Local Plan in relation to development at Blackmore is unsound for the following principal reasons: - 1. Brownfield sites in the Borough as a whole should be developed before ever considering green field and green belt sites. 2. I understand there has been no "housing needs survey" to demonstrate that Blackmore should be in the LDP. 3. The infrastructure in and around the village is already exhausted. Blackmore cannot take more housing without extensive changes to the infrastructure.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 26352

Received: 12/03/2019

Respondent: Mr Arthur Birch

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Blackmore has only modest facilities and would struggle to accommodate these developments

Full text:

There does appear to be any clear coherent idea for the villages including Blackmore. No cohesion with neighbouring authorities. Other private developments, i.e. Fingrith Hall Lane and Red Rose Lane etc don't appear to have been taken into consideration. Blackmore has only modest facilities and would struggle to accommodate these developments. Locally traffic seems to be mushroomed. Parking in the village centre is difficult. I think there are other allocated sites which could accommodate these developments more easily.

Attachments:

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 26445

Received: 12/03/2019

Respondent: Mrs Wendy Dunbar

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Site is greenbelt and should remain as such. BBC should develop all brownfield sites first before considering greenbelt development.

Change suggested by respondent:

Site R25 and R26 to be removed from the LDP and Planners to refer to the BVHA neighbourhood plan which details the local housing needs, etc.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 26458

Received: 12/03/2019

Respondent: Mr John Orbell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Green belt should be protected. Build on brownfield sites first.

Change suggested by respondent:

Sites R25 and R26 be removed from the LDP Plan. You need to refer to he Blackmore Village Heritage Association for our Local Housing Needs for our sustainable community. We do not want unwanted and unjustified large scale development. There has been no 'Housing Needs Survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore is included in the LDP. Was is not the Brentwood Borough Council who said "we will continue to protect our key assets including the environment, heritage and character of the borough".

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 26462

Received: 12/03/2019

Respondent: Mrs Karen York

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Green belt should be protect.

Change suggested by respondent:

Please refer to the plan put together by BVHA

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 26491

Received: 19/03/2019

Respondent: Mr Surinder Panesar

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

infrastructure is not strong enough to manage the proposed growth and there is a disproportionate allocation to Blackmore.

Change suggested by respondent:

Site R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP and planners should refer to the BVHA neighbourhood Plan which clearly sets out the local housing needs, for our already sustainable community.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments: