Appendix 2: Preferred housing allocations and small sites allowance 2015 - 2030
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 52
Received: 29/08/2013
Respondent: Miss Claire Griffin
Re Ingatestone garden center.
I strongly object to the proposed 130 dwellings. That is a ridiculous amount of homes for a tiny and historic village to contend with. The facilities of the village are simply not equipped to deal with such a huge increase. Ingatestone has already sustained damage to its quaint character with recent modern developments.To make matters even worse the size of the proposed development is larger than the majority of the other sites(many of which have facilities which are far better suited to a significant increase in housing).
You are slowly eroding the beauty of the area.
Re Ingatestone garden center.
I strongly object to the proposed 130 dwellings. That is a ridiculous amount of homes for a tiny and historic village to contend with. The facilities of the village are simply not equipped to deal with such a huge increase. Ingatestone has already sustained damage to its quaint character with recent modern developments.To make matters even worse the size of the proposed development is larger than the majority of the other sites(many of which have facilities which are far better suited to a significant increase in housing).
You are slowly eroding the beauty of the area.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 72
Received: 10/09/2013
Respondent: Mrs Elisabeth Allum
My Property backs on to the area for development. In order to have the proposed 38 dwellings, some would have to be flats. When I built my house in 2009 I had to adhere to STRICT council guidelines with regard to ridge height, and sustainable homes, clearly these would be breached if flats were allowed to be built. I bought my property because it is not overlooked by others. Where would the access road be???? Ongar Road is already congested in the mornings, traffic backing up over the A12 bridge and the proposal would increase that problem.
My Property backs on to the area for development. In order to have the proposed 38 dwellings, some would have to be flats. When I built my house in 2009 I had to adhere to STRICT council guidelines with regard to ridge height, and sustainable homes, clearly these would be breached if flats were allowed to be built. I bought my property because it is not overlooked by others. Where would the access road be???? Ongar Road is already congested in the mornings, traffic backing up over the A12 bridge and the proposal would increase that problem.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 73
Received: 10/09/2013
Respondent: Mrs Elisabeth Allum
The land to the rear of 310 Ongar Road is a wildlife haven with squirrels and badgers, amongst other animals, living there. Privacy and security of existing residents will be compromised. Schools and doctors surgeries will be overloaded. Traffic, already a problem, will be worse.
The land to the rear of 310 Ongar Road is a wildlife haven with squirrels and badgers, amongst other animals, living there. Privacy and security of existing residents will be compromised. Schools and doctors surgerys will be overloaded. Traffic, already a problem, will be worse.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 75
Received: 23/09/2013
Respondent: Mr Michael Burt
I bought my house in 1986 because it is a cul-de-sac with one road access and has residential private garage parking for my households' four cars. Compulsory purchasing my garage block would leave the parking situation in Wistaria Close in complete chaos. Opening up the cul-de-sac and taking away private residential parking would increase the likelihood of all types of crime and seriously devalue properties in Wistaria Close.
I bought my house in 1986 because it is a cul-de-sac with one road access and has residential private garage parking for my households four cars. Compulsory purchasing my garage block would leave the parking situation in Wistaria Close in complete chaos. I would take legal advise along with most of my neighbours and fight the council. Opening up the cul-de-sac and taking away private residential parking would increase the likelihood of all types of crime and seriously De Value properties in Wistaria Close.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 173
Received: 24/09/2013
Respondent: Mrs. Mary Goodall
Objection to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 6 - Appendix 2)
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 -policies DM23 & Appendix 2) as I consider:
1. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade 11 Listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
2. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Fram makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
3. The farm land & buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
4. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its prescence and historical value.
5. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
6. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
7. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
With all this mind, please reject this preferred option immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 273
Received: 01/10/2013
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
Former Landings Surgery, Outings Lane - In light of the location, nature and style of existing surrounding dwellings, a housing a density of 40 dph is far too high at this specific location and would create hazards for road users with its proximity to Deal Tree Corner. Indeed the housing densities employed throughout this table appear arbitrary and seem to be designed more to meet the 3500 dwellings required during the Plan period, than be a realistic assessment of practical housing densities, giving a very optimistic view of the development potential of the sites listed.
(1) Reference is made to the "Policies Map" (here and elsewhere) but I can find no map identified as such either in the document or on the planning web site.
(2) Last Paragraph -10 years is far too short a life for a new barn before it may eligible for conversion to a residential dwelling and will encourage speculative barn building in Green Belt by farmers and others. The ban on development for residential purposes should be at least 50 years - when the building will be in need of refurbishment anyway.
(3) Former Landings Surgery, Outings Lane. In the light of the location and nature and style of existing surrounding dwellings, a housing a density of 40 dph is far too high at this specific location and will create hazards for road users with its proximity to Deal Tree Corner. Indeed the housing densities employed throughout this table appear arbitrary and seem to be designed more to add up to 3500 than be a realistic assessment of practical housing densities, giving a very optimistic view of the development potential of the sites listed.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 465
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Sans Souci Enterprises Limited
Agent: JTS Partnership LLP
The Council may seek a mixed use development of the Wates Way site. At the residential density implied by identifying the site for 128 units, the Company does not consider this to be feasible and requests that the policy/appendix be amended to reflect this.
As the Council is aware, the Wates Way Industrial Estate is more than half vacant, with the remaining leases due to expire within the next 12/18 months. Accordingly, the Estate will be available for development during the first year of the Plan period and any phasing provisions should recognise this.
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 580
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Hansteen Holdings Plc
Agent: McGough Planning Consultants
Strategic Allocation master-planning would be constrained by density assumptions in Appendix 2. Both sites 020 and 021 are allocated for 250 dwellings. The density works out at 39dph for 020 and 25dph for 021. If the density assumption is uniformly 39 dph across both sites this would lift site 021 to 384 dwellings (and the total across both sites to 634 dwellings). No other housing allocation outside West Horndon assumes a density lower than 40dph. Applying this to 020/021 total housing rises to 650. Clarification sought on why density assumptions are different and lower than elsewhere within Brentwood.
See attached
Support
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 663
Received: 25/09/2013
Respondent: Threadneedle Property Investments Ltd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Support the inclusion of Sites 020 and 021 as part of the West Horndon Strategic Allocation in Appendix 2.
Our client is aware that the Plan suggests approximately 250 dwellings could be constructed on Site 020 (the equivalent of 39 dwellings per hectare). However, on the basis that this site is located close to the settlement centre and train station, our client considers that a greater density could be achieved in this location. We therefore respectfully request that Brentwood Council increases the approximate density for this site to a minimum of 320 dwellings (the equivalent of 50 dwellings per hectare).
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 794
Received: 26/09/2013
Respondent: EA Strategic Land LLP
Agent: Iceni Projects Limited
Appendix 2 indicates that not all of 037B is to be allocated, but the whole site is needed to ensure that the requisite infrastructure and facilities can be accommodated.
See attached
Comment
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 954
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Bolson's Limited
The preferred housing allocations are listed, including three sites (with different owners) in West Horndon for 250, 250, 1,000 dwellings. It is recorded that the source for the inclusion of the sites in the Council's "Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment" was "discussion with developer/landowner". In the case of the estate, there is reference to pre-application discussions having happened in 2012/13.
Bolson's is on the rear of land numbered 021 (the second 250 dwelling site) owned by Hansteen Land Holdings and the pre-application discussion reference is 12/06173/PREAPP. Please supply the information on the planning file in relation to those discussions.
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1571
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Ms Jacqueline Cassam
-Site is not a "brownfield" site.
-Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
-Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
-Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
-Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
-Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
-Bats have been sighted in the area.
This is Green Belt Land with Listed Buildings on it.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1576
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Drysdale-Gordon
-Site is not a "brownfield" site.
-Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
-Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
-Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
-Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
-Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
-Bats have been sighted in the area.
We strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1666
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Captain Leigh Radford
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1668
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mrs Pat Russell
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1670
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mrs Holly Coleman
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1672
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Askew
Number of people: 2
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1674
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mr Tony Powell
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1676
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Miss Marilyn Haselgrove
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1678
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Powell
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1680
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Miss Alexis Smith
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1682
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mrs Cynthia Knox
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1684
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Austin
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1686
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mr M J Woods
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1688
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Wiseman
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1690
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mr Alan England
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1692
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mrs Helen White
1. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
2. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA. Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site is extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road.
7. Bats have been sighted in the area.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2):
1. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
2. Hulletts Farm is formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "cartilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of this 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
3. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
4. The farm land and buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
5. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
6. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
7. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred options immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1792
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mr Peter Baldock
1. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA.
2. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2) as I consider:
1. Hulletts Farm is a formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "curtilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of the 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
2. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
3. The farm land & buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
4. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
5. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
6. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
7. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred option immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1794
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mr Leon Flack
1. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA.
2. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2) as I consider:
1. Hulletts Farm is a formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "curtilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of the 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
2. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
3. The farm land & buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
4. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
5. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
6. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
7. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred option immediately.
Object
Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation
Representation ID: 1796
Received: 02/10/2013
Respondent: Mrs. Daphne Gilbert
1. Hulletts Farm is classified Grade II listed property. This is not stated in Council's SHLAA.
2. Site is not a "brownfield" site.
Any development would go against NPPF guidelines.
3. Impact of any development would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties and its picturesque setting.
4. Lawful use for this land is agricultural, therefore its excluded from NPPF definition "previously developed land."
5. Any modern development within close proximity would ruin its presence and historical value.
I strongly object to the draft local development plan in Orchard Lane, Pilgrims Hatch (site 11 - policies DM23 & Appendix 2) as I consider:
1. Hulletts Farm is a formally classified Grade II listed property. Nowhere in Brentwood Borough Council's SHLAA does it acknowledge or state this. The surrounding land & buildings in its "curtilage" are also deemed to be Listed. These surroundings gardens, paddocks and attractive louvered brick & slate roofed farm buildings provide an important contribution to the setting and status of the 16th century building. Any 21st century development demolishing these buildings and paddock, which stands just a few feet away from this medieval farmhouse, would directly go against National Planning Policy Framework guidelines.
2. The site is definitely not a "brownfield" site as Hulletts Farm makes a significant contribution to the character and history of Pilgrims Hatch, along with neighbouring Gents Farm, further down Hulletts Lane.
3. The farm land & buildings were used for livestock farming until 2001, so their lawful use remains agricultural and is specifically excluded from the definition of "previously developed land" in NPPF page 55, along with private residential gardens.
4. The original sale of land by the previous owner to build houses in Orchard Lane (prior to the Lee family moving in the late 1950's), obviously adhered to and abided by the criteria set down by Brentwood Council & English Heritage with regards to proximity of buildings. Any modern development being made within feet of the Farmhouse would irrevocably ruin its presence and historical value.
5. Access to/from the site would be extremely difficult from A128 Ongar Road, as visibility is very poor from the Ongar direction.
6. I have seen Bats in the vicinity of the farm buildings which need to be protected.
7. The impact of any development to this site would seriously diminish the amenity of many local properties in this picturesque setting of Hulletts Lane.
With all this in mind, please reject this preferred option immediately.