Object

Preferred Site Allocations 2018

Representation ID: 19707

Received: 12/03/2018

Respondent: Jon Pimblett

Representation Summary:

No supporting detail for allocation 022. There is no clarity is provided on how the proposal now meets the spatial strategy. The site is also not the most obviously sustainable.

Full text:

Within the documents there is no supporting detail for allocation 022. We are being asked to comment on a proposal with major impacts for local residents with an outline of what is proposed - limited detail. The site was originally rejected because it did not meet the spatial strategy. It, however, remains but no clarity is provided on how the proposal now meets the spatial strategy.
This development has obvious detrimental impacts on transport, amenities, schools. This proposed development is within the Green Belt. It would only be exceptional circumstances that development began in Green Belt land. It is totally unclear what these circumstances are. The site is also not the most obviously sustainable. Any scale of development will increase in care traffic as amenities are not close and there is limited pathways, no bus routes and over 25 minute walk to Brentwood station.

Attachments: