Question 11
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13034
Received: 08/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Elaine Smith
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Other: -Great Historical Interest 4
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13064
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Kenneth Wooldridge
Houses 3
Commercial/indistrial 4
Nature reserve/wildlife -
Farmland 3
Woodland 3
Degraded/derelict/wasteland 2
Infrastructure (road/rail/pylons) 3
Leisure/recreation facilities 2
Other: heavy transport through village 3
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13073
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Joan McCready
Nature Reserves/Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/Derelict/Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure/Recreation Facilities: 2
Q1: This entire exercise is pathetic when shipyards, coalmines and factories were closed down there was a need for an excercise such as this in those locations.
Q2: See my husbands answers.
2 yes by all means consider the issues, providing that the answer in Q1 is considered.
3 One who is opposed to the envisaged growth there seems to be little point in commenting on an y individual site.
5, No - the previous answers deal with this.
6 No, no, no.
7. No - Turn the disused office blocks into factories.
10
Scenic Beauty/Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
11
Nature Reserves/Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/Derelict/Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure/Recreation Facilities: 2
8 Yes - But no more supermarkets.
9 Yes - Instead of farmland being sold to developers, use ot for leisure.
4 None. The A127 is developing into a built up corridor from London to Southend.
12 No - This whole programme should have been rejected. We have an MP who is a member of the government, what is his part in this?
13 The previous answers deal with this.
1.14 Consultations. For a consultation process this must be seen as a disgrace.While there has been talk of growth - only today (16/02/2015) have we seen consultation documents. It has to be asked just who has been consulted.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13081
Received: 14/02/2015
Respondent: Chris Wain
Question 11 Houses 2, Commercial 1, Wildlife 4, Farms 4, Woods 3, Degraded land 1, Infrastructure 1, Leisure 3
Question 10 The landscape near to where I live rates Very High level 5 for all categories
Question 11 Houses 2, Commercial 1, Wildlife 4, Farms 4, Woods 3, Degraded land 1, Infrastructure 1, Leisure 3
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13082
Received: 14/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Lynn Wain
q11 house 1, commercial 1, wildlife 4, farm 4, woods 2 degraded land 1, infrastructure 2 leisure 4
q10 all 5
q11 house 1, commercial 1, wildlife 4, farm 4, woods 2 degraded land 1, infrastructure 2 leisure 4
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13085
Received: 23/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Richard Sutton
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13086
Received: 23/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Rita Tuffey
Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
See attached.