19 Former Landings Surgery, Outings Lane, Doddinghurst (043) - (11 dwellings)

Showing comments and forms 1 to 9 of 9

Object

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 310

Received: 02/10/2013

Respondent: Mr. Colin Barber

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Object to Policy DM23 Site 19 Former Landings Surgery, Outings Lane, Doddinghurst for the following reasons:
- proposed development would be out of character to existing properties
- site is adjacent to listed Tudor building
- existing parking issues
- proposal is not inkeeping with Council's guidelines

Full text:

Re: Proposal for 11 dwellings at the form Surgery and The Landings, Outings Lane, Doddinghurst

We have discovered the Brentwood Local Development Plan for 2015-2030 and that there is a recommendation for a new housing development in Outings Lane on the above-mentioned site.

We would like to inform you that we are totally against the proposed plan for 11 dwellings to be built on the site. We fully appreciate that the site needs to be re-developed and to construct residential homes would be a good solution. The concern we have is to what type of dwellings will be erected and how many. Outings Lane has an assortment of larger properties, all individual to on another. It would therefore be totally out of keeping constructing the kind of properties described in the proposal, espically adjacent to a listed Tudor building of local historical value (Barfield Farm).

Erecting 11 properties would also cause a dangerous problem with parking at the end of Outings Lane which is already a hot spot for serious accidents. There is already an issue at the other end of Outings Lane where the residents of those properties park dangerously on the pavment very close to the junction and we feel a similar situation would arise.

In 2003 we applied for Planning Permission to extend our property and we came up against various problems when submitting our plans to Brentwood Borough Council. We were told that property had to be in keeping with the other properties in the road and, therefore, our Plans had to be submitted numerous times for the Council to agree Planning Permission. We do not understand how residents applying for Planning Permission have so much trouble yet when the Council want to develop sites these guidelines seem to be totally disregarded.

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 835

Received: 09/09/2013

Respondent: Mr. John A. Scott

Representation Summary:

I was present at a well attended meeting at Doddinghurst Parish Hall when the above proposal was explained. The meeting spoke overwhelmingly against it. The meeting was held on September 5, 2013
People were horrified at the density of the proposed housing plan, not only is it totally out of keeping with the area. It will cause dangerous traffic hazards on what remains still is a narrow country land and an equally existing dangerous junction with Blackmore Road. This proposal must be thrown out of the consultation document on planning grounds and common sense.

Full text:

I was present at a well attended meeting at Doddinghurst Parish Hall when the above proposal was explained. The meeting spoke overwhelmingly against it. The meeting was held on September 5, 2013
People were horrified at the density of the proposed housing plan, not only is it totally out of keeping with the area. It will cause dangerous traffic hazards on what remains still is a narrow country land and an equally existing dangerous junction with Blackmore Road. This proposal must be thrown out of the consultation document on planning grounds and common sense.

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 837

Received: 09/09/2013

Respondent: Mrs Mary Scott

Representation Summary:

I am not judge of land capacity so cannot say whether 11 dwellings are appropriate for this land, though I have my doubts.
However, the proximity of this land to the crossroads gives me cause for concern. 11 dwelling = 11 cars. 11 dwellings probably = 22 cars and possibly more, making the crossroads at the top of Outings Lane even more dangerous. The only way to avoid this would be to make access to site from the Blackmore Road on the Brentwood side of the Ashwell's Lodge which would be over Green belt land.

Full text:

I am no judge of land capacity so cannot say whether 11 dwellings are appropriate for this land, though I have my doubts.
However, the proximity of this land to the crossroads gives me cause for concern. 11 dwelling = 11 cars. 11 dwellings probably = 22 cars and possibly more, making the crossroads at the top of Outings Lane even more dangerous. The only way to avoid this would be to make access to site from the Blackmore Road on the Brentwood side of the Ashwell's Lodge which would be over Green belt land. The decision is yours, but I doubt 11 is an apt number on traffic issues alone.

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 849

Received: 02/10/2013

Respondent: E. Hodgson

Representation Summary:

I object quite strongly against the building of 11 houses in Outings Lane. Traffic at Deal Tree Corrner is Bad, cars coming along Hook End Road to work every morning. Childrens buses to school, school buses along outings lane, cars and buses trying to get onto outings lane, then the Blackmore Road. Blackmore Road at Deal Tree Corner where a school bus stops, 3 houses yes, people opposite the site with steep drives a danger getting out. If this went through it would mean at least eleven more cars opposite. Outings Lane is narrow enough.

Full text:

I object quite strongly against the building of 11 houses in Outings Lane. Traffic at Deal Tree Corrner is Bad, cars coming along Hook End Road to work every morning. Childrens buses to school, school buses along outings lane, cars and buses trying to get onto outings lane, then the Blackmore Road. Blackmore Road at Deal Tree Corner where a school bus stops, 3 houses yes, people opposite the site with steep drives a danger getting out. If this went through it would mean at least eleven more cars opposite. Outings Lane is narrow enough.

Attachments:

Comment

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1000

Received: 23/08/2013

Respondent: Mr. and Mr Stephen and Jayne Miles

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

No objection to redevelopment of the former doctors surgery site for residential. Issue is density of development. Preference would be to construct a small number of similar sized homes to the existing detached family homes at the top end of Outings Lane, in-keeping with the surrounding propreties. Each new house should be constructed with a garage and off street parking for a minimum of two modern sized vehicles per property.

Images provided in the attached document to expand on the response.

Full text:

We have noted the Brentwood Local Development plan for 2015-2030 and that there is a recommendation for new housing in Outings Lane on the combined site of the former Doctors Surgery and The Landings.

Unfortunately we are unable to attend the local meeting in Doddinghurst on Thursday September 5th due to a planned vacation. If there are capabilities to join the meeting via audio or Skype then we would be happy to participate.

Nevertheless we have comments on the proposals as follows:
The former doctors surgery has now been demolished and we understand that the sale of The Landings has been agreed with a single owner securing title for the strip of green belt land next to Barfield Farm, the former doctors surgery as well as The Landings. Figure 1 shows the current plot in question outlined in red. Figure 2 shows the current demolished state of the former doctors surgery. Figures 3 and 4 are from the Brentwood Local Development Plan which suggests 11 dwellings for the site of the former surgery and The Landings which occupies 0.27 hectares. We understand from Figure 3 that Brentwood Council is not including the strip of green belt in the current planning proposal.

We have absolutely no objection to redevelopment of the site; clearly it would be beneficial to do so. To construct residential homes on the site is also a sensible solution. Our concern however is on the number of dwellings proposed, what type of dwellings are proposed and especially for the provision of sufficient parking for those homes. In December 2012, outline planning approval for two detached homes on the site of the former surgery was approved (Fig 5). This is the type of construction that is sensible for the area and we would be delighted to support.

Outings Lane consists of relatively large individual detached residential properties. It would be inkeeping with the surrounding properties in Outings Lane to construct similar types of large detached properties. With this in mind, then a proposed construction of 11 properties becomes infeasible and a concern because of the quantity of available land. Being open, honest and quite selfish for a minute we confess we are keen to encourage that redevelopment of the site does not risk devaluing the properties in Outings Lane including our own. Figures 6 shows a mock up indicating that 8 homes could be built on the site but would have limited garden and parking facilities.

When the doctors surgery was in operation, there was always a problem with increased traffic and parking in Outings Lane due to the number of people visiting the surgery exceeding the available parking. This led to parking down Outings Lane which occasionally made it difficult to get onto our drive if vehicles had been parked poorly. Unless sufficient provision is made for parking within the new developed site then we are faced with the prospect of returning to those days which we are keen to avoid. To address the parking issue please can homes be built assuming accommodation and allocation of a minimum of two vehicles per property with the parking space/ garage sufficiently large to accommodate modern sized vehicles and thus avoid the parking situation at Widbrook, which is at the bottom of Outings Lane where vehicles are parked on the pavement to ensure the road is not obstructed (see figure8 9 and 10).

In summary we have no objection to redevelopment of the former doctors surgery site. Our recommendation and preference would be to construct a small number of similar sized homes to the existing detached family homes at the top end of Outings Lane which are inkeeping with the surrounding propreties. We recommend that each is constructed with a garage and off street parking for a minimum of two modern sized vehicles per property.

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1024

Received: 02/10/2013

Respondent: Robin Kennedy

Representation Summary:

Part of this site was left redundant following a special case made to ignore the Local Plan and re-develop the previously existing surgery on Green Belt. It was argued that the development cost on this site would be high given certain constraints. The major part of the site is still a single dwelling.

A development of 11 houses could not meet the planning requirement being out of character to this area, which is a singular plot (Linear) the current permission for two 'Town Houses' also seems out of character.

Full text:

See attached letter

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1338

Received: 02/09/2013

Respondent: Mrs Anne Slaughter

Representation Summary:

An infill development of 3 houses on the site of the old Outings Lane Doctor's Surgery may be acceptable, but a development of 11 affordable residential homes at the top of Outings Lane would be wholly unacceptable for a number of reasons.
- Potential scale and impact of the new build on the adjoining Green Belt & the road currently
- The highways access to the land in question is very problematic,
- Potential lack of parking for that number of properties would lead to congestion similar to that at the bottom of Outings Lane.

Full text:

With reference to the Brentwood Borough Council Local Development Plan Newsletter to Outings Lane residents dated July 2013 I wish to express the following views.

A quality infill development of 3 houses on the site of the old Outings Lane Doctor's Surgery may be acceptable, and a sensible use of land, but a development of 11 affordable residential homes at the top of Outings Lane would be wholly unacceptable for a number of reasons. First, the potential scale and impact of the new build on the adjoining Green Belt & the road currently thought to be one of the 'best' roads in Doddinghurst, secondly the highways access to the land in question is very problematic, and thirdly the potential lack of parking for that number of properties would lead to congestion similar to that at the bottom of Outings Lane. It is a constant issue with many developments in the area that inadequate parking provision leads to vehicles being parked anywhere in the highway including footpaths. In particular both the Wid Terrace development & the site of the former Outings lane Surgery created unnecessary accident black spots around the road junctions at both ends of Outings Lane. The junction with Blackmore Road is an offset crossroads which is both dangerous & hazardous at the best of times. Also the roads that traverse Outings Lane at both ends are scheduled bus & school bus routes, so any obstructions at either end will increase the risk of accidents for motorists & pedestrians.

In The Gardens, Doddinghurst area we have already seen a local farmer selling off pieces of Green Belt behind Church Woods, so that residential gardens can be 'unofficially' extended beyond the curtilage. These fenced off areas are a true blot on the landscape. Brentwood Council appears to be unable to stop these residents doing exactly what they like & breaching regulations behind their backs. Also Meadow Farm - the storage of vehicles is creeping into the same Green Belt field, which has been fenced off even further. Surely building a new development in Outings Lane will give way to an even greater relaxed attitude & encourage further disregard for the Green Belt in the village, and the countryside will be completely ruined

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 3304

Received: 24/07/2013

Respondent: Mrs. M. Tibbitt

Representation Summary:

Objects to the proposed building of 11 houses at Former Landings Surgery Lane, Outings Lane, Doddinghurst. Concerns relating to:
- sizes of houses would not be in keeping with the area.
- Outings lane is a beautiful English country lane with houses of different design and character.
- lack of capacity at local primary school.
- lack of capacity at local health centre, it already has long waiting lists.
- parking for new houses.
- existing traffic congestion.

Full text:

I would like to strongly object to the proposed building of 11 houses at the above site.

11 Houses on such a small plot would not be in keeping with the area, they would look like rabbit hutch size buildings and could possible be a blot on the landscape. Outings lane is a beautiful English country lane with houses of various design and character and should be kept as such. 1 or may be 2 houses of different design would surely enhance the area.

There is also the fact that 11 smaller houses mean families with children--would the school be able to accommodate more children? They have already added a mobile unit because the amount of pupils they already have.

Can the New Medical Center accept more patient when we already have to wait for two to three weeks for an appointment. I myself had to wait a month to see my own Doctor, albeit it was not an emergency but it was still important for me to see him.

Will these house have garages for their cars or will they park along the roadside? That is a dangerous corner and is used by a lot of traffic.

Will the infrastructure of Doddinghurst be able to cope with more houses?

Can your planning officer not see the problem's , l have named but a few or is it a case of "I don't live there so it does it matter what it looks like---or is it a matter of finance---more houses bigger profit for the builder plus more council tax for the borough.

I await your reply with interest.

Comment

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 3367

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

Representation Summary:

Comments provided on each proposed site allocation on attached RAG spread sheet.

Comments provided for when sewers cross sites, in which case the site layout should be designed to take this into account. Appropriate locations and process suggested in attached response.

Comments on surface water disposal measures and inclusion of SUDS.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments: