18 Land at Bell Mead, Ingatestone (042) - (16 dwellings)

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 45

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 500

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: M. Giles

Representation Summary:

DM23 (18) - SUPPORT mixed housing development i.e. elderly and small family/first time buyers e.g. 2 bedroom with own parking spaces for elderly and others. Elderly may drive for some years, have visitors, Careers etc who need to access the elderly.

Full text:

DM23 (18) - SUPPORT mixed housing development i.e. elderly and small family/first time buyers e.g. 2 bedroom with own parking spaces for elderly and others. Elderly may drive for some years, have visitors, Careers etc who need to access the elderly

DM23 (21) - OBJECT. Too large - too many dwellings, too many extra people for facilities in village e.g. parking, surgery, schools. Too far from station for pedestrians therefore more cars assessing and parking. Current cafe a very much appreciated facility by locals and visitors.

DM28 Deep Dell Park. OBJECT. Unless all there who buy a piece of Green Belt and need local facilities same as travelers can be treated the same. I have relatives who would like to move here to help, look after me, still one working in London, travelling daily and would love a house with a garden with views of countryside, same treatment?

We have nothing against present residents BUT everyone should be able to be assured of being treated and considered in the same way whatever their family history if they are law abiding citizens. What is good enough and accessible to one should be seen as good enough and accessible to all who can afford it and live as constructive law abiding citizens.

Attachments:

Comment

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 752

Received: 22/08/2013

Respondent: Mr. Robert W. Fletcher

Representation Summary:

This is only Council owned land at the bottom of Bellmead, not the whole site (including land at The Crown currently with planning permission). Access to any other development would be severely restricted if just this smaller site is developed. Development should provide resident parking for cars and cycles. There should be no additional off-street parking on site. Need a footway and/or cycleway through Bellmead, from High Street to Fairfield and the railway station and beyond.

Full text:

I visited your exhibition at Seymour Field, Ingatestone on the 9 August and took copies of documents and had a useful discussion regarding a number of points relating to Ingatestone & Fryerning. I have subsequently downloaded the documents and had another study of the plans and text. On the whole I support the plan, and believe it is good to raise these issues at a borough and parish level at regular intervals. I am particularily interested in encouraging more sustainable transport in the area and would comment on the two preferred options for development that relate to Ingatestone:

Ingatestone Garden Centre - 130 dwellings
Although this site is in Mountnessing PC area it does of course have an impact on Ingatestone centre and its facilities. On the grounds that there are constant calls for additional car parking in Ingatestone to support local shops and businesses I would expect that a further 130 dwellings would have some useful financial impact on Ingatestone, bearing in mind the need to ensure that access to doctors' etc. are looked at. Bearing in mind the location some thought should be given to improving walking and cycling access to Ingatestone Station and village centre and also to Mountnessing and beyond to the proposed Crossrail site in Alexander Lane, Shenfield, via the A12 and B1002. 130 properties would also of course have a positive financial impact on Mountnessing PC although it would be sad to lose the garden centre.

Land at Bellmead, Ingatestone - 16 dwellings
This is interestingly only the BBC land at the bottom of Bellmead and not the whole site, including the land beyond The Crown Inn, which was the subject of a past application. On this basis I envisage a development along the lines of nearby Elston Close, off High Street, which has resident's parking, both for cars and cycles. I would like to see a footway and/or cycleway link through Bellmead, from High Street, to Fairfield and the railway station and beyond. The pathway to the station is at present under improvement, as was suggested at a previous Local Plan meeting I attended a few years back. Moving the slightly hazardous current pedestrian crossing in Market Place to The Bell would mean that AES pupils could be directed in a much safer route to the station, plus the benefits to local public transport routes this would have for the residents, businesses and visitors to the village. Some thought should be given to adequate direction signs to aid visitors from the station, which was suggested by a Year 7 group of pupils from the AES Ingatestone a few years ago. I therefore cannot see any call for additional off-street parking at this site being justified as it is small and there are more pertinent improvements required to walking and cycling access. New cycle parking just off the High Street has just been installed by the Community Association (the first in the village centre itself!) and the Parish Council have been asked to look at additional sites at the Library, Bellmead and Market Place. The Crown Inn has recently been sold and I am not sure what the position is regarding the land beyond it which goes down to the water course or that at the back of the old workhouse cottages in the High Street but access to any other development would be severely restricted should this smaller site be built as proposed.

There have recently been problems with flooding adjacent to Norton Road and Elston Close from the water course from Fryerning Lane, which goes along the boundary of the site going under the High Street by Bellmead and emerging to the East of this site. Care must be taken to ensure any flood risk here is dealt with. I have spoken to the EA regarding the problems and restricted access to the water course by the Elston Close development and they are to look at the site.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 848

Received: 02/09/2013

Respondent: Mr. Horace Cooper

Representation Summary:

When developing the land at Bell Mead, Ingatestone (16 dwellings), provision should be made to include a public footpath linking Bell Mead to the footpath that runs from Fairfield Recreational ground to the station car park and the station.

Full text:

When developing the land at Bell Mead, Ingatestone (16 dwellings), provision should be made to include a public footpath linking Bell Mead to the footpath that runs from Fairfield Recreational ground to the station car park and the station.

Attachments:

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1215

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mrs. Denise Riffenburgh

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead, Ingatestone is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.
Furthermore, I would like to add that we have a vehicle which is too large to fit in our car port area. We therefor have to park in Crossby Close. The vehicle is already difficult to position, to allow access for normal sized cars into the close. I see no option for larger vehicles to pass by, especially on a regular basis. We also bought the house because it has side access into a cul de sac - we felt that this would be a safe option for our 3 young children, aged 3yrs, 5yrs & 6 yrs. We would definitely not welcome the road being opened up.

Attachments:

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1345

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Jaime Davis

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1351

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mr. John Toomey

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1353

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mr Chatters

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1355

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mr. Michael Boettchor

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1357

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Hazel Cowing

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1359

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mrs. Kate Hanson

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1361

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mr. David Hanson

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1363

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: J. Bass

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1365

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: K. Watson

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1367

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mrs. M. Grech

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1369

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Y. Carey-Rushmer

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1371

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: K.J. Sweeney

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1373

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: L.R. Bail

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1375

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Name Not Supplied

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1377

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Name Not Supplied

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1379

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Jean Lamb

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1381

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Name Not Supplied

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1383

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mr. Tomas Greblo

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1385

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mr. Kevin Riffenburgh

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1387

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Miss Jayne King

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1389

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mrs. Marion King

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1395

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mrs. Janet Toomey

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1397

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: L. Chamberlain

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1399

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mrs. Jessica Clements

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1401

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mr. Steve Richardson

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1403

Received: 27/09/2013

Respondent: Mr. Roy Maguire

Representation Summary:

- Proposed housing for land at Bell Mead is a good idea.
- Its close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
- I totally oppose the release of any additional Greenbelt land, specifically the green belt adjacent to Mountnessing village school.
- Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. Current proposed access way through Crosby Close is far too narrow.

Full text:

I am writing to SUPPORT your Local Plan mentioned above.
I believe that your proposed developments in the area of The Ingatestone Garden Centre and Bell Mead is a good idea as they are both close to the village of Ingatestone with all of its growing facilities and amenities and a very good infrastructure which is more than adequate to take these proposed developments.
I am concerned and totally OPPOSE the release of any additional Greenbelt land and specifically the green belt adjacent to the village school in Mountnessing. I am aware that Crest Nicholson have undertaken many tests on the site and are putting in their plan to you at your deadline, which I assume is a tactic they use to their benefit.
Mountnessing has a lack of key facilities and an infrastructure which is inadequate to take development such as that proposed by Crest Nicholson. The current proposed access way through Crosby Close is also far too narrow.
I therefore totally SUPPORT Brentwood Council regarding the non release of any additional green belt land other than that is already allowed for in the plan.